Investment in Stocks/Equities for the Young Indians
Somewhow, the link i posted has been removed due to reasons 'm unaware of...still, must be something they don't want it here...fine...i want you to search in fb using the aforementioned sentence :)
and yea....in case we crack the cat....we still will have interviews to face and what help could our interest in stocks be of is something that amuses me in this regard 😛
bhai...re.estimate 60/$......agar aisa ho gya to bwala mach jaega..... Ebay pe global easy buy pe ek toothbrush bhi 1000rs. ka ho gya hai...
On a serious note...Indian govt. cant afford rupee depriciation of such magni.... according to my calc. 60rs/$(on an average) will account to import bills of 430*60/50= >500billion$ which will account to a CAD of 8-9% of GDP.... ..............Crude getting to 89-90$/barrel(which in itself is quiet unlikely in near future) wont help much with rupee @65 level coz i guess crude is just about 30% of indian imports and with rupee @60-65 levels imports will cross the 500B$'s mark....Though,Ball is still in FINMIN court....Initiative is what is required.....!!!!
On a lighter note.....Pranab Da ko sourav da ki tarah tadipaar karva dena chahiye.... ABCLIKS bhai ko naya FM bana dena chahiye.....
P.S Whatever problem INDIA is facing today..90% of them lies in governance issues.....Policies are driven by political motives and Govt. is still eluded by a comparatively decent GR.....THE VERY FIRST PARA OF THIS YEARS ECONOMIC SURVEY TELLS THE WHOLE STORY.....Even the approach paper of the 12th 5 yr. plan paints a near impossible picture....Govt. should understand that growth is more than just numbers,which has not been the case since 1956......!!!
I like the analogy. Though a Future is actually more like betting.
A very simple example without any finance lingo A farmer is unsure of how good his crop of tomatoes will be, so he sells it for Rs500, 2 months before the crop matures (as a promise on paper). The ketchup manufacturer thinks that 500 is a good price to buy since the price might rise later on. So he also agrees to buy the crop, 2 months in advance (on paper). After 2 months, farmer delivers the tomatoes and the manufacturer pays 500.
This is a Forward contract.
Problem is that if the actual market price 2 months later is 600, farmer may not honor his contract. Or if the price is 400, the manufacturer may buy from the market rather than from the farmer. So we have the "risk of default". Another problem is that farmer may want to sell 470 kg, but the manufacturer may want to buy 630 kg. Or that the crop might not be ready in exactly 2 months.
To overcome these problems, there is a solution...
Now, both of them went to a third person of good financial standing whom both respect (say, an exchange) to ensure that there is no going back on the promises, plus they standardized the quantity sold, dates and other things like that - say, contracts of 100 kg each to be delivered on 3rd thursday of the month. In addition, they introduced more standardization and security measures (in Finance lingo, clearing, MTM etc).
thank u for the lucid explanation but why then enter into a contract when i believe almost all contracts will b disputed why not buy the goods on floating prices?? and do the farmers actually have the know how of how theses things work?
There are three types of derivative instruments used
Forwards : Long term contracts , let say you want to buy SBI shares , but right now you dont have the funds , so you think you will buy it at end of the month , but the risk is that SBI Share price might appreciate in the meantime , so what you do is try fix an contract with a seller that you will buy
" 100 shares of SBI at Price of 1700 on 30th Nov 2011" , so what you have done is you have hedged the market risk out of your trade , no matter what the price of SBI is at the end of the month you can buy at 1700
There are downsides to this as well , what if the SBI shares would have depreciated to 1600 , you would still have to buy at 1700 , so you may be at loss of rs 100 per share
Futures : Forwards and Future contracts are similar in context , differences are that Futures are exchange traded , where as Forwards are OTCs , Futures don't generally result in actually delivery of the stocks but trade can be settled on cash to cash basis
Options : Options are like this , You want to buy SBI shares in future so u get into a contract that is " Buy 100 shares of SBI at Price of 1700 on 30th Nov 2011"
but what if SBI share price is 1600 on 30th Nov , now you would like to buy it from the market isnt it 😃 , Option allows you that choice , to cancel the contract and buy from the market . But offcourse any choice comes with a price , there is upfront fee in options ,which you have to pay to the seller , so in case you dont wish to honor the contract , the seller is compensated for some loss :)
I have explained a very small part of what F&O; is , taking example of only buying/selling of stocks , but we can do trades on currency , oil , metal , foodgrain , Stock Index itself 😃 , in US people even trade on weather :)
vibudhjain Says
also what is forward and options?
Something i posted long time back should answer your query
Something i posted long time back should answer your query
again i dont get the point that why people choose these options of future contracts which may not hold any genuity!!!!!! its like lottery.. and if u dont honour contract u can still get away with little penalty...then what is the fun of it?? its like govt open a new massive lottery scheme just to improve on its unemploment figures.... sorry if i havent understood it correctly but futures forwards options are way over my head......
nyways i have 1 more query which is more advisable to do?? gold etf or e-gold??
again i dont get the point that why people choose these options of future contracts which may not hold any genuity!!!!!! its like lottery..
and if u dont honour contract u can still get away with little penalty...then what is the fun of it??
its like govt open a new massive lottery scheme just to improve on its unemploment figures.... sorry if i havent understood it correctly but futures forwards options are way over my head......
nyways i have 1 more query which is more advisable to do?? gold etf or e-gold??
About lottery Friend u are saying derivatives are lottery because they are dependent on certain future uncertain event ,so insurance are same too.they are also dependent on future event which may happen or not.According to law read something related to Wagering Agreements :)
About non honoring agreements The OTC contracts are between two parties mutually which has counter party risks.But i guess u wont enter in to contract with party unless u are sure about their honoring agreement capability .And contracts which are Exchange based they are highly liquid and they is no counter party risk as u are Trading with an Exchange .
About difficulty in understanding Derivatives
U must have seen ths videos they are self explainable .And if u want detail Info Read Book OPTIONS , FUTURES & OTHER DERIVATIVES by JOHN C HULL
There is no question of genuineness here. All forward, future, options contracts are enforceable and bound by law of the land as per the contract agreements. What little penalty do you talk of? Being banned from trading or being banned from an exchange or monetary penalties of millions of dollars or losing the 50% margin or losing the collateral posted is NOT a small thing.
Lottery would be a case where one person wins and others do not get anything. The inverse of a lottery is close to an insurance contract... something that works very neatly with the principles of probability and distributions.
Derivative contracts are more like a calculated bet. In fact, most investments are the same. Is investment in Gold not a bet that the gold price will rise? Similarly when one buys 10 shares of Infosys, one is "betting" that the price will go up.
Likewise, when you invest in a derivative strategy, say, a straddle or a butterfly composed of Infosys options, else a Nifty future, you are betting that the share price or Nifty will behave in a particular manner eg: be rangebound between 5000 and 5400 etc
As a product structurer, I can construct products to suit the needs of various customers (like corporates, MF, Institutions etc) as per the return parameters that they specify and help them meet their investment objectives. Plus lot of risk management / hedging needs of these institutions are met via derivatives.
Thus said, I not propose that derivatives are all "goody goody" material... they have been described as "Financial Weapons of mass destruction" by none other than the Omaha of Investment world - Warren Buffet. All types of investments would have their pros and cons and the responsibility lies on the user to understand and use them in such a manner that is not detrimental to the masses.
There have been many cases of misuse of derivatives, but I would need to write a book to elaborate on that. However, there have been innumerable cases of good use of derivatives where they have helped organizations and individuals plan, hedge and manage risk in a very effective manner.
If you are interested in further learning, I can have corporate / college trainings organized on specific areas of derivatives.
again i dont get the point that why people choose these options of future contracts which may not hold any genuity!!!!!! its like lottery.. and if u dont honour contract u can still get away with little penalty...then what is the fun of it?? its like govt open a new massive lottery scheme just to improve on its unemploment figures.... sorry if i havent understood it correctly but futures forwards options are way over my head......
nyways i have 1 more query which is more advisable to do?? gold etf or e-gold??
One would be surprised at the financial and technological innovation that has been witnessed in the agriculture sector. Farmers are very much aware of the "simple" forward contract.
It is only the complex derivatives that are used for "taking advantage" of investors. 😉 Someone mentioned weather derivatives... rainfall insurance.
Another example is the sale of structured products to school districts, for them to invest them huge surplus funds, by wily Investment Banks. There are many cases in the courts, still pending. There have been changes in the US law now to protect such investors but earlier the situation was different.
thank u for the lucid explanation but why then enter into a contract when i believe almost all contracts will b disputed why not buy the goods on floating prices?? and do the farmers actually have the know how of how theses things work?
Some pointers as u have asked to justify the answer:
1. The major reason why almost every analyst has a NO recommendation for FB shares is FACEBOOK itself !! Mark has gone mad and is charging exorbitant rates for ads on FB and the market is on a steep decline as far as ad revenue is concerned !!!
2. Revenue is on decline and Q1 results have been negative for FB,First time ever in the history of this company.
3. Other HOT BC IPO's like google,yahoo,MSFT when started trading on the exchange were backed up by strong Q-Q results whereas in case of FB,its just the opposite.
4. Google/MSFT/YAHOO are still a safe bet just coz of one factor --------diversification..Just imagine,if google only had ORKUT & Yahoo only had messenger as their major revenue source at the time of their IPO,their stocks would have been somewhat trading @ 1-2 $'s per share today
5. BIG US/EU Brands dont advertise (generally) in INDIA(biggest FB user base).....Thats also one of the reasons why FB revenues will follow a flat curve
I have valued FB in my excel spreadsheet....will post detailed analysis and valuation @ some later date...!!!!
2. Revenue is on decline and Q1 results have been negative for FB,First time ever in the history of this company.
But i think bottom-line is effected more due to the expenses made on promoting and launching the IPO
It has more than doubled the user base in India now to 51 million and india has become the third largest market for them after brazil , so some other things points a different picture
They are also launching a new facility of paid status messages etc which have been tested in NZ right now , so they are evolving new business models for revenue generation and are adapting
Mark has made a comment on how they cant take growth in Asian Markets for granted , so i am sure he is aware of the need for continuous innovation in the business :)
ADDED later, I think Facebook is also evolving on how the data analytics on customer behaviour can be used better to pitch to their clients , They are omnipresent on the web world , always collecting data and this presence i guess makes them a priority one choice for ads .
But i think bottom-line is effected more due to the expenses made on promoting and launching the IPO
It has more than doubled the user base in India now to 51 million and india has become the third largest market for them after brazil , so some other things points a different picture
They are also launching a new facility of paid status messages etc which have been tested in NZ right now , so they are evolving new business models for revenue generation and are adapting
Mark has made a comment on how they cant take growth in Asian Markets for granted , so i am sure he is aware of the need for continuous innovation in the business :)
Sir,I know MARK is coming up with new user friendly features but i am afraid thats not how the market thinks......Market believes in what has been,not what could/can be.....For EXample:: Facebook's TIMELINE has been a huge disappointment.I think Products in the pipeline are not the way to predict the revenue growth esp. in high beta stocks.It can go either way.
And FB in INDIA def. has a huge user base but when we talk about the share of revenues from developed countries to developing countries the story takes a U-TURN.India def. has a huge user base but the revenue that FB earns from india/user is not even 5% of what it earns from U.S/EU
And we as analyst look at the revenue/user no. rather than just going by the demographics.isnt it??
FB def. is trying to adapt itself but currently the stock is overvalued,even the listing price of 38 $ is above par i would say....!!!
Also GOOGLE with its new user policies have taken a huge step this yr..It tracks almost everything now and all the details about site traffic/user interests/age/location etc etc is made available public so,i guess its easier for companies to market their product.It would be interesting to compare the growth in google ad revenues VS FB's next 3-4 Q's coz that would play a huge part in deciding the future of FB.According to me,google will hold its market share.(worst case)
P.S My personal take.I maybe wrong in my approach.
One would be surprised at the financial and technological innovation that has been witnessed in the agriculture sector. Farmers are very much aware of the "simple" forward contract.
It is only the complex derivatives that are used for "taking advantage" of investors. 😉 Someone mentioned weather derivatives... rainfall insurance.
Another example is the sale of structured products to school districts, for them to invest them huge surplus funds, by wily Investment Banks. There are many cases in the courts, still pending. There have been changes in the US law now to protect such investors but earlier the situation was different.
are there some specific kinds of entry barriers in these contracts?? i mean when i c things like castor seed or cotton or mustard on mcx i say to myself i can go to local kiryana shop fr that!!!!!!!! please forgive my stupidness
Wrote an article on Currency devaluation a few months back with a friend , sharing it here as i guess relevance of this topic has increased quite a lot ..
Wrote an article on Currency devaluation a few months back with a friend , sharing it here as i guess relevance of this topic has increased quite a lot ..
Though i am not a big fan of Mr.Aswath damodaran :-P yet,i completely agree with most of his points.I think FB is overvalued by almost 40%.I have a strong feeling Q3-Q4 earnings will play a huge role in deciding the future of this company.Facebook really have to prove itself if it wants to compete with the likes of GOOG/MSFT.& why it got away with its IPO shares,being largely overvalued,just coz everyone thought that it has a Bazooka in its kitty.As a matter of fact,it was just another squirt gun.
A very apt comment by Mr. Damodaran to summarize the discussion --- "Facebook might be a great product but it's not a great company yet ". :