"It improves the chances of manipulating emotions in an appropriate manner"
Which context you are talking about? Of Cos.. There is pronoun reference error "it " but i feel this is not a complete sentence. I feel this sentence is correct.
Many critics reproved the curator's bold decision to organize the exhibit in chronological order rather than art movement. A. to organize the exhibit in chronological order rather than art movement B. to organize the exhibit in chronological order rather than by art movement C. to organize the exhibit according to chronological order rather than according to art movement D. that organized the exhibit in chronological order rather than art movement E. that organized the exhibit by chronological order rather than by art movement
Some restaurants in Kenya offer dishes made with the meat of giraffes and gazelles not normally served in restaurants in other parts of the world. A. dishes made with the meat of giraffes and gazelles not normally served B. dishes made with the meat, not normally served, of giraffes and gazelles C. dishes, being made with the meat of giraffes and gazelles, not normally served D. dishes of the meat of giraffes and gazelles which are not normally served E. dishes made with the meat of giraffes and gazelles, dishes not normally served
1. To organize in x .....by y is not wrong. Choices D and E are out because: Curator's bold decision that organized.... "the decision did not organize" "curator did". IMO: Choice B.
2. not normally served...needs a concrete qualifier. with the word dishes preceding it, there is no room for error. IMO: Choice E.
Many critics reproved the curator's bold decision to organize the exhibit in chronological order rather than art movement. A. to organize the exhibit in chronological order rather than art movement B. to organize the exhibit in chronological order rather than by art movement C. to organize the exhibit according to chronological order rather than according to art movement D. that organized the exhibit in chronological order rather than art movement E. that organized the exhibit by chronological order rather than by art movement
Some restaurants in Kenya offer dishes made with the meat of giraffes and gazelles not normally served in restaurants in other parts of the world. A. dishes made with the meat of giraffes and gazelles not normally served B. dishes made with the meat, not normally served, of giraffes and gazelles C. dishes, being made with the meat of giraffes and gazelles, not normally served D. dishes of the meat of giraffes and gazelles which are not normally served E. dishes made with the meat of giraffes and gazelles, dishes not normally served
4. Before George Eliot became the popular and respected novelist known as George Eliot, she was an anonymous translator and essayist of formidably far-ranging scholarship. (A) Before George Eliot became the popular and respected novelist known as George Eliot, she was (B) Before she had been the popular and respected novelist, George Eliot, she was (C) George Eliot has been the popular and respected novelist, George Eliot, after such time as she was (D) Before George Eliot became the popular and respected novelist, George Eliot, she was (E) George Eliot, before she was the popular and respected novelist, George Eliot, had been
I went with D but got it wrong!!! :(
This question is from Kaplan and correct answer given is A
Although the government's expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than that spent by tobacco companies, many believe that the government should allocate no more funds to a battle they perceive as pointless. (A) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than (B) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically less than (C) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically lower than (D) law suit expenditures regarding tobacco companies amount to a dramatically lower sum than (E) law suit expenditures against tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than ______________________
Although the government's expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than that spent by tobacco companies, many believe that the government should allocate no more funds to a battle they perceive as pointless. (A) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than (B) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically less than (C) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically lower than (D) law suit expenditures regarding tobacco companies amount to a dramatically lower sum than (E) law suit expenditures against tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than ______________________
Hi Realtachyon,
My choice is for Option-C. Subject-Verb agreement, plural verb and plural noun. Less vs Lower, in this case "Lower" looks better.
Although the government's expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than that spent by tobacco companies, many believe that the government should allocate no more funds to a battle they perceive as pointless.
(A) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than (B) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically less than (C) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically lower than (D) law suit expenditures regarding tobacco companies amount to a dramatically lower sum than (E) law suit expenditures against tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than ______________________
My take on this question.
A. Incorrect - Expenditures = Plural; Amounts = Singular B. Incorrect - Incorrect usage of "less than" C. Correct - Expenditures = Plural; Amount = Plural; Correct usage of a comparitive degree "Lower than" D. Incorrect - expenditures regarding tobacco companies E. Incorrect - expenditures against tobacco companies
Although the government's expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than that spent by tobacco companies, many believe that the government should allocate no more funds to a battle they perceive as pointless. (A) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than (B) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically less than (C) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically lower than (D) law suit expenditures regarding tobacco companies amount to a dramatically lower sum than (E) law suit expenditures against tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than ______________________
its SVA..problem expenditures and amount is the right usage..
Guys..the answer is B...beats me too.... explanation: Since amount is singular, the verb needs to be has been, so you can eliminate (A) and (C). Amount of research is better than cause research (which makes no sense at any rate), leaving you with (B) and (E). (E) creates a misplaced modifier, so (B) is the correct choice.
Although the government's expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than that spent by tobacco companies, many believe that the government should allocate no more funds to a battle they perceive as pointless. (A) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than (B) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically less than (C) expenditures on law suits involving tobacco companies amount to a sum dramatically lower than (D) law suit expenditures regarding tobacco companies amount to a dramatically lower sum than (E) law suit expenditures against tobacco companies amounts to a sum dramatically lower than ______________________
3-2 split. D and E can be eliminated. Reason-expenditures regarding and expenditures against awkward usage. A can be eliminated. reason-expenditures-plural ....amount-plural C can be eliminated reason-Sum-countable.. less-countable
Guys..the answer is B...beats me too.... explanation: Since amount is singular, the verb needs to be has been, so you can eliminate (A) and (C). Amount of research is better than cause research (which makes no sense at any rate), leaving you with (B) and (E). (E) creates a misplaced modifier, so (B) is the correct choice.
3-2 split. D and E can be eliminated. Reason-expenditures regarding and expenditures against awkward usage. A can be eliminated. reason-expenditures-plural ....amount-plural C can be eliminated reason-Sum-countable.. less-countable
My answer is in bold.
Hey Puys,
In this case Expenditures is plural so its verb needs to be plural as well (originally amounts):o . Hence, Option-A and E are liable for elimination.
Which is correct "Sum be less than or lower than?":D Lower than is right; less is only correct when it refers to something that can't be counted. One can eliminate Option-B
Sentence must start with expenditures on law suits or law suit expenditures? Option-D is unclear and unidiomatic in this context :nono:, Hence liable for elimination.
In process of elimination(POE), Option-C is remaining. Hence, correct.
Which context you are talking about? Of Cos.. There is pronoun reference error "it " but i feel this is not a complete sentence. I feel this sentence is correct.
The explanation given in the solution is
"the word manipulating is wrong intead "holding" shud be used
As i am posting the reply after a long time I am reiterating my problem
I was not able to interpret the mistake in the below mentioned sentence "It improves the chances of manipulating emotions in an appropriate manner"
My choice is for Option-C. Subject-Verb agreement, plural verb and plural noun. Less vs Lower, in this case "Lower" looks better.
What's OA?
Kindly tellme why the following sentence is wrong
"It improves the chances of manipulating emotions in an appropriate manner"
The explanation given in the solution is
"the word manipulating is wrong intead "holding" shud be used
As i am posting the reply after a long time I am reiterating my problem
I was not able to interpret the mistake in the below mentioned sentence "It improves the chances of manipulating emotions in an appropriate manner"
Kindly assist
Hi Tarun_b,
The word "it" refers to non-living things, and the kind of context is concerned, can be of "he or she" as well. As far as the word manipulating is used, it can not be used for manipulation of emotions, but for holding it.
The Few/a Few days that r left to him he spends in solitude and meditation.
2. The few/a few hints on essay-writing are quite to the point.
3. A few/the fewshort poems in the volume show signs of genius.
4. The few/a few trinkets show has are not worth much.
1> A Few days .. 2> A few hints 3> A few short poems 4> What exactly is the last sentence...('has' and 'are' both one after other...QQQ)
I've answered though, i'm just wondering...
The is for some constant, significant and for sure some thing definite... The Ganges, The everest, the five BLACK people.. etc..
so if out of these points here, if emphasis is on Noun which follows "The/A" construct immediately, we need The else...A... BTW, all of them have verb supporting plural verb..