GMAT Sentence Correction Discussions

58. Diesel engines burn as much as 30% less fuel than gasoline engines of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses that have been implicated in global warming.
A of comparable size , as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses that have
B of comparable size, as well as emit far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses having
C of comparable size, and also they emit far fewer carbon dioxide and other gasses that have
D that have a comparable size, and also they emit far fewer of the other gasses having
E that have a comparable size, as well as emitting far fewer of the other gasses having



How is the damnnn answer A?????? It should be B...parallelism!!!
Burn Emit....!!!!


B/D/E...are out of question...why???

simple:

Having been exahusted by attempting so many mock tests, I fell to fatigue syndrome!
OR
After attempting so many mock tests, i fell to fatigue syndrome

Paasive voice - have been + 'ING' didn't make sense for gasses there...

Now between A/C

Look C has a AND ALSO -Always Wrong on Gmat

A) is a winner for sure..

little :w00t: effect as why emitting is used and not emit...
well, take this example:

I stand first in the class, as well as score highest in each subject...

what if, if i say..

Scoring highest in each subject, I stand first in the class..

is something wrong with next one????..think
Puys,
correct this sentence:

California apple,the finding of recent research,may prevent serious heart problems in many adults.


Its clearly a case of misplaced modifier..it implies that the finding of recent research not the california apple prevents heart problems...

Sentence can be reformulated as..
The finding of recent research reveals/shows that california apple may prevent serious heart problems in many adults.

Since 1986 when the Department of Labor began to allow investment officers' fees to be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations began paying their investment advisers a small basic fee, with a contract promising higher fees if the managers perform well.
(A) investment officers' fees to be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations began
(B) investment officers' fees to be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations began
(C) that fees of investment officers be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations have begun
(D) fees of investment officers to be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations have begun
(E) that investment officers' fees be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations began

Since 1986 when the Department of Labor began to allow investment officers' fees to be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations began paying their investment advisers a small basic fee, with a contract promising higher fees if the managers perform well.
(A) investment officers' fees to be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations began
(B) investment officers' fees to be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations began
(C) that fees of investment officers be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations have begun
(D) fees of investment officers to be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations have begun
(E) that investment officers' fees be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations began



I'll go wid E...clear case of subjunctive.. allow that...be...
also allow requires that coz..
A-> refers to allow investment officers' fees not the investment officers' which is wrong construction.
B->same reason
C->lengthy... investment officers' fees is more concise
D->same reason as A
E-> corrects the errors..

wats d OA???

anyone clarify 'besidesvs except'...

I'll go wid E...clear case of subjunctive.. allow that...be...
also allow requires that coz..
A-> refers to allow investment officers' fees not the investment officers' which is wrong construction.
B->same reason
C->lengthy... investment officers' fees is more concise
D->same reason as A
E-> corrects the errors..

wats d OA???


Try Again...

In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.

(A) for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them

(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned

(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned

(D) in place of their employees' paychecks, for those of them assigned

(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them

the finding of recent research is modifying california apple. misplaed mofier issue.

I am sure ur question isnt this straight forward.
whats ur question exactly??

Puys,
correct this sentence:

California apple,the finding of recent research,may prevent serious heart problems in many adults.
the finding of the recent research indicates/shows that California apple may prevent serious heart problems in many adults.

i would go with this !


Thanx buddy......appreciate your thoughts.

Hey Ponds..

How its going buddy? Have you started with application procedure???

BTW, to thes sentence here..

Clearly a misplaced modifier...

"the finding of recent research" is seemingly modifying californian apple insted it should have modified the recent research..

so you may re-write it in some fashion:

California apple,the finding of recent research,may prevent serious heart problems in many adults

The finding of recent research indicates that : sentence...

Amsey,
I was looking for correct way to formulate this sentence, Thanx for enlightening me, application process is going on......all the Best !
What about big Party last thursday, is there any PG meet?

Its clearly a case of misplaced modifier..it implies that the finding of recent research not the california apple prevents heart problems...

Sentence can be reformulated as..
The finding of recent research reveals/shows that california apple may prevent serious heart problems in many adults.


Hey Sdt83,
I was looking exactly same thing.

the finding of recent research is modifying california apple. misplaed mofier issue.

I am sure ur question isnt this straight forward.
whats ur question exactly??


Hey BizzareNym,
Thanx for your response, I was looking for correct way to shuffle/flip this sentence......nothing more than that.
Since 1986 when the Department of Labor began to allow investment officers fees to be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations began paying their investment advisers a small basic fee, with a contract promising higher fees if the managers perform well.
(A) investment officers fees to be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations began
(B) investment officers fees to be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations began
(C) that fees of investment officers be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations have begun
(D) fees of investment officers to be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations have begun
(E) that investment officers fees be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations began


Hey pj02...my mistake.. subjunctive must not be called in as sentence doesn't deal wid uncertainty...cudnt get d rite way of thinking.
this time i'm sure.. its D
Reason.. it must include have begun.present perfect..C can b knocked out .. incorrect structure..

Im i rite dis time???
Hey pj02...my mistake.. subjunctive must not be called in as sentence doesn't deal wid uncertainty...cudnt get d rite way of thinking.
this time i'm sure.. its D
Reason.. it must include have begun.present perfect..C can b knocked out .. incorrect structure..

Im i rite dis time???


BINGO... u got it correct this time...

IMO B

de others dont make sense!!!

In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.

(A) for their employees paychecks, assigned by them

(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned

(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned

(D) in place of their employees paychecks, for those of them assigned

(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them
in theory, international civil servants at the united nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees paychecks, assigned by them to the united nations.

(a) for their employees paychecks, assigned by them
'assigned by them' is ambiguous
(b) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned

(c) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
having been assigned???

(d) in place of their employees paychecks, for those of them assigned
'those of them' redundant and wordy...

(e) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them
'employees to have been' there is no use of 'to' here..

imo - b
oa?
In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.

(A) for their employees paychecks, assigned by them

(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned

(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned

(D) in place of their employees paychecks, for those of them assigned

(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them


Substitute - for is right usage. comma unnecessary here. Stay away from apostrophe choices (specially plural) if possible.
Since 1986 when the Department of Labor began to allow investment officers fees to be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations began paying their investment advisers a small basic fee, with a contract promising higher fees if the managers perform well.
(A) investment officers fees to be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations began
(B) investment officers fees to be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations began
(C) that fees of investment officers be based on how the funds they manage perform, several corporations have begun
(D) fees of investment officers to be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations have begun
(E) that investment officers fees be based on the performance of the funds they manage, several corporations began


Again, "stay away from apostrophe choices" as much as possible. Since-have begun is needed in this context, owing to a action-reaction continuum scenario.
In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.

(A) for their employees paychecks, assigned by them

(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned

(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned

(D) in place of their employees paychecks, for those of them assigned

(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them


Its B.
A-> 'them' creates ambiguity..also the phrase assigned by them modifies paychecks not the employees.
C-> having been not very clear..
D & E -> redundant..substitute & in place of have got d same work 2 do..
Although all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live, Soviet audiences have seen a great deal of coverage.
(A) all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live
(B) all the Communist party conference's Moscow proceedings were not carried live
(C) all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have not been carried alive
(D) not all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have been carried alive
(E) not all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were carried live

why E..any epln??
Although all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live, Soviet audiences have seen a great deal of coverage.
(A) all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live
(B) all the Communist party conference's Moscow proceedings were not carried live
(C) all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have not been carried alive
(D) not all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have been carried alive
(E) not all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were carried live

why E..any epln??

Although is used when condition is positive and result is surprise/unexpected. Since not is negative qualifier in condition, it looks negative.
A-> condition looks negative
B-> Unclear. it changes meaning that conference were held in Moscow only
C-> passive
D-> passive
E-> is correct as 'not' now makes sentence positive and result unexpected.

I have started prep few days back. So pls DONT take this as authentic. Can anyone comment on my explanation.
Although all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live, Soviet audiences have seen a great deal of coverage.
(A) all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live
(B) all the Communist party conferences Moscow proceedings were not carried live
(C) all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have not been carried alive
(D) not all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have been carried alive
(E) not all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were carried live

why E..any epln??



my logic says that we always encounter statements which have a negative connotation with altho...like altho he was ill....altho he is a bad boy...etc...the point is that we use altho then we cant begin positively..we need to have a clause/phrase that makes it look negative...so E

A and E have a subtle but a big difference between them.

(A) all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live
it means all were not carried live. in other words, none was carried live
(E) not all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were carried live
it means not all but few proceedings were carried live.

Hope this clarifies why E is preferable.


Although all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live, Soviet audiences have seen a great deal of coverage.
(A) all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live
(B) all the Communist party conferences Moscow proceedings were not carried live
(C) all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have not been carried alive
(D) not all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have been carried alive
(E) not all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were carried live

why E..any epln??