abhinav90
(Abhinav Srivastava)
September 21, 2009, 4:37pm
747
6^ 57/61= 6^-3/61=6^-3*306^3/61 =51^3/61=-10^3/61=-24 thus = 61-24 = 37 m i correct? plz elucidate from the third step...
i m not able to do after 2nd step coz its becoming tedious to apply inverse euler in that case...
viveknitw
(Vivek Kumar)
September 21, 2009, 4:38pm
748
rajiv55bits Says
dude, if u can send me any pdf's regarding quant it'd be helpful. My mail id is , thanks in advancedont put ur email like this.
if mods c this, it will not be good for u.........
if u want pdfs- u can always browse the attachments in threads!
rajiv55bits
(rajiv55bits)
September 21, 2009, 4:39pm
749
thanq so much i'm sorry i didn't know that
viveknitw
(Vivek Kumar)
September 21, 2009, 4:43pm
750
plz elucidate from the third step... i m not able to do after 2nd step coz its becoming tedious to apply inverse euler in that case... i would recommend the method followed by divisht above.
any way ma method is
in the third step i multiplied by 306
Now i need to multiply numerator with a multiple of 6 which leaves remainder 1 with 61 so the cond 6m = 61k+1 => ...which is true for k=5 and the number is 306.
cyborg5021a
(Nitin Kumar)
September 21, 2009, 5:27pm
751
sorry for late reply. 37 is the correct Ans
avinav2712
(Avinav C Thakur)
September 21, 2009, 5:43pm
752
dont put ur email like this. if mods c this, it will not be good for u......... if u want pdfs- u can always browse the attachments in threads! You did well in suggesting him to remove his email id but your own post contains it. Please edit the quoted portion in your post and remove his email id.
ankurb
(Ankur)
September 21, 2009, 6:13pm
754
viveknitw Says
61^59 % 59 ? 61^59 mod 59 =
2^59 mod 59 =
32* (2^6)^9 mod 59 = 32 * 125^3 mod 59 =
32 * 343 mod 59 = 2
remainder = 2
viveknitw
(Vivek Kumar)
September 21, 2009, 6:15pm
755
my doubt was - can v use euler here! even by euler v get the same answer but r 59 and 59 co-prime?
cyborg5021a
(Nitin Kumar)
September 21, 2009, 6:21pm
756
my doubt was - can v use euler here! even by euler v get the same answer but r 59 and 59 co-prime? i guess u r mistaking in applying euler. we need to verify if 59 n 61 are coprime.
cyborg5021a
(Nitin Kumar)
September 21, 2009, 6:24pm
757
cyborg5021a Says
i guess u r mistaking in applying euler. we need to verify if 59 n 61 are coprime.but we ca use Fermat's little theorem here.
59 is prime and 59 and 61 are coprime.
hence 61^58 mod 59 =1
hence 61^59 mod 59 = 2
ankurb
(Ankur)
September 21, 2009, 6:28pm
758
my doubt was - can v use euler here! even by euler v get the same answer but r 59 and 59 co-prime? for two numbers to be co-prime, they should have gcd = 1.
now, decide for yourself.
drkunjan
(Kunjan Detroja)
September 21, 2009, 10:37pm
759
cyborg5021a Says
i guess u r mistaking in applying euler. we need to verify if 59 n 61 are coprime.both are prime number. what else to check to tell them co-prime.
using Euler theorem
Euler no if 59 =58.
61^58*61/59= 61/59=> remainder is 2.
drkunjan
(Kunjan Detroja)
September 21, 2009, 10:46pm
760
How many two-digit numbers increase by 18 when their digits are reversed? (1) 5 (2) 6 (3) 7 (4) 8 (4) 10
naga25french
(Lost Warrior )
September 21, 2009, 10:48pm
761
How many two-digit numbers increase by 18 when their digits are reversed? (1) 5 (2) 6 (3) 7 (4) 8 (4) 10 numbers of form 11p + 2 satisfies the condition
so 3)7
drkunjan
(Kunjan Detroja)
September 21, 2009, 10:54pm
762
numbers of form 11p + 2 satisfies the condition so 3)7 ya right answer but your approach is very nice....
jain_ashu
(Ashutosh Jain)
September 21, 2009, 10:58pm
763
How many two-digit numbers increase by 18 when their digits are reversed? (1) 5 (2) 6 (3) 7 (4) 8 (4) 10 7 numbers. The difference between the digits should be 2.