again in q162 when there is ambiguity in code for came between 4 and 9 the answer is both statements are sufficient to answer the question.if any of the puys have given this test sift through the solution and help me through
Statements: Some gases are liquids. All liquids are water. Conclusions: I. All gases being water is a possibility. II. All such gases which are not water can never be liquids.
2k is taller than j and l,l is taller than p ,s is not the tallest
i think statement 1 alone is sufficient to answer it as it is given that p is only taller than s(does it not mean that s is the shortest) but the answer is both statements are required
passage: It is true that the green revolution has succeeded in transforming the Indian economy from a situation of severe food shortage into one where the country has not only become self-reliant in food production but has also been able to generate a sizable surplus for export. However, the high doses of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, which have been used under this 'conventional' farming technology (along with 'high yielding varieties of seeds' and irrigation) are now reversing the trend and causing severe environmental and health hazards, including the contamination of ground water.
q1. Which of the following statements would strengthen the author's argument ?
1. India faced severe food shortages before the inception of green revolution.
2. Organic farming i.e. farming without the use of chemical fertilizers makes the food products too expensive at retail level.
3. Many farmers have reported that the soil in their fields became infertile within five years of switching over to chemical fertilizers.
4. Farmers not relying on the hybrid and high yielding variety of seeds as propagated by green revolution do not make as much profit as the ones using methods of green revolution.
5. High yielding varieties of seeds as propagated by green revolution do not require much water for irrigation purposes and are also resistant to pest attacks.
according to me correct answer should be 3 but its given 1 in the answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
is it possible to solve all the syllogism questions by tick cross method! i m finding a lot of difficulty in facing syllogism questions! any help to solve these questions. some good pdf or any other material to have a proper understanding of syllogism.. my exam is on 14th June ! don't have that much time! thanx ! 😃
'it is rush hour traffic' is written as 'sa le do mi ru'
'go to school' is written as 'be no pa',
'one hour to go' is written as 'mi fi pa be',
'rush to one' is written as 'fi be sa' and
'traffic fine' is written as 'ga ru '.
'ru be wa' would mean ———
1. is to way
2. traffic is to
3. way is traffic
4. to traffic way
5. Cannot be determined
mahendra answer is 4 but i guess 5 should be the answer
explanation: code for "ru be" is "to traffic" but no code has been given for wa. so if the question would had been "ru be wa" possibly means ______ then 4 can be the answer. correct me if i am wrong......