Kal kaun kaun yahan se CAPF ka exam de raha hai?
anyone having oliveboard coupon code..?
GD Topic:
Engineers going for Bank Jobs is a national waste.
The following table gives the details of the area utilized and the production of wheat by 3 countries P, Q and R from 2003 to 2008.
http://i.imgur.com/2Owb6uQ.png
Yield Return = Production/Unit Area
(1) 2021
(2) 1885
(3) 2011
(4) 1914
Q2. In which year is the percentage increase in the yield return the highest for country Q?
(1) 2005
(2) 2006
(3) 2007
(4) 2008
Q3. The yield return of country R in 2008 is how much more or less than of country P in 2005?
(1) 20
(2) 23
(3) 25
(4) 27
GD Topic:
Effect of defaulting Greece on World and Indian Economy
Study the following graph carefully to answer the questions that follow:
http://i.imgur.com/AzYtqOn.png
Q1. How much time did P take to complete his journey on day 5?
1) 1 hr.
2) 30 min.
3) 2 hrs.
4) 20 min.
5) 3 hrs.
Q2. What was the average distance traveled by P in all 5 days?
1) 10 km.
2) 11 km.
3) 15 km.
4) 12 km.
5) 20 km
Q3. What was the difference between time taken by Q on day 3 and that of P on day 5?
1) 30 min.
2) 1 hr.
3) 1 hr. 6 min.
4) 36 min
5) 40 min.
Q4. What was the average distance traveled by P and Q on Day 4?
1) 12 km
2) 18 km
3) 30 km
4) 15 km
5) 20 km
friends why notifications are not popping up in profile wen there are so many posts...is it a prob in my profile?
Banks generally borrow short-term funds repayable on demand, with a maturity period of one to fifteen days, used for inter-bank transactions. These funds are borrowed from which of the following money markets to meet the mandatory Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) and Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) requirements as stipulated by the Central bank?
- Notice Money Market
- Call Money Market
- Bill Market
- Money Market
- None of these
Hey Puys... In descriptive paper how many questions would be there??
will we have question paper button in sbi mains or no?
BANNING BEEF ! IS IT JUSTIFIED
India is a secular ,democratic and diversified country. People living here have liberty to choose what they love to wear ,read ,think ,speak as well as eat.It cannot force anyone and teach anyone what they should eat and what not.That's why there has been a hue and cry ever since the maharashtra government announced a ban on the sale and possession of beef in the state , under the "MAHARASHTRA ANIMAL PRESERVATION BILL" 1995 resulting in a fine of rs 10,000 or imprisonment upto 5 years.
This issue of banning the slaughter of cow family has rekindled the flame of debate between religion and secularism.The whole society has been divided into 2 sections .some consider it is a good step and will lead to banning all kinds of animal slaughter in future,which in turn encourage people to be vegetarian.Curtail slaughter of innocent animals that are mercilessly killed in the name of puja and rituals.Will end the riots related to cow and bull slaughter.Empowered animals rights.
While some see it as an injustice towards minority .An intrusion into the freedom and rights of people.A sectarian step by the state government backed by central government to turn diverse India into a Hindu country.Depriving poor section from proteins,since it is a cheaper source of protein.Also resulting in loss of export , rise in unemployment ,leaving pharma industries into shambles as many of their products involve ingredients like fats from buffaloes.Will also hamper cattle economy as people generally nurture them to earn for their living.
Analysing the whole situation it can be concluded that everything has its 2 sides-positive and negative ,it depends on us how we implement them.As every problem comes with a solution in the same way every chaos gives us a chance to introspect where we went wrong.Thus government should make efforts to balance majority sentiments with minority needs.Not just ban beef but all kinds of flesh trading activity so that no one feel cheated and if cannot control it should try to regulate it ,by taxing heavily ,providing new opportunities so that they can leave this profession .IN short this issue should not be looked by religious or political angle but as a wider socio-economic and democratic angle wherein everyone has a win win situation.
pls tell mistakes and corre required.
T Bills are issued in multiples of
Failed in prelims by 1.25 marks.... Sad but determined to crack upcoming exams... Could anyone please suggest the best book for quants other than Aggarwal's that matches the difficulty level of bank po exams? Thanks in advance....
Entrepreneurial failure.
In every society, firms perform three functions, the social function, the managerial function, and the entrepreneurial function. The social function defines the very existence of the firm as a social institution: the serving of consumer and social needs; the provision of employment and income for labor; and the contribution of funds the support of the local and national community. The managerial function of the firm determines how economic resources should be allocated to alternative uses, and how different tasks are to be performed. The entrepreneurial function accommodates the discovery and exploitation of new business opportunities-the most important function, as it keeps the firm alive for decades, even centuries to come.
The three functions aren't independent from each other. The social function, for instance, imposes different constraints on the entrepreneurial and managerial functions, while the entrepreneurial and the managerial functions impose their own constraints on the social function. This means that a failure in any of the three functions undermines the other two functions, and if it goes unchecked, can end in the demise of the organization. That's exactly what happened in the case of Eastman Kodak.
In its early days, the company excelled in all three functions. In the social area, it generated thousands of jobs; and contributed resources to the national, state, and the local, Rochester, community. In the managerial area, it executed a shrewd marketing strategy by bundling nicely its cameras with the film processing photography technology, often giving cameras away to sell its film and processing chemicals, as Goggle (NASDAQ:GOOG), and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) have been doing these days. In the entrepreneurial area, it offered consumers innovative products that allowed them to capture everyday moments.
Over time, however, the company failed to come up with new versions of its products that will fed-off imitators, as Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) has been doing in recent years-Polaroid and Fuji's challenge is the case in point. The company further failed to leverage its core competences and capabilities in photography chemistry to expand into emerging industries, as other late 19th century American companies did. Corning Inc. (NYSE:GLW), for instance, survived and thrived by leveraging its core capabilities, the processing of glass substances, to develop a sting of blockbuster products, the glass for Edison's electric lamp, the traditional TV tubes, the heat-resistant glass for missiles and kitchen ware, the fiber-optic cables that
Entrepreneurial failure.
In every society, firms perform three functions, the social function, the managerial function, and the entrepreneurial function. The social function defines the very existence of the firm as a social institution: the serving of consumer and social needs; the provision of employment and income for labor; and the contribution of funds the support of the local and national community. The managerial function of the firm determines how economic resources should be allocated to alternative uses, and how different tasks are to be performed. The entrepreneurial function accommodates the discovery and exploitation of new business opportunities-the most important function, as it keeps the firm alive for decades, even centuries to come.
The three functions aren't independent from each other. The social function, for instance, imposes different constraints on the entrepreneurial and managerial functions, while the entrepreneurial and the managerial functions impose their own constraints on the social function. This means that a failure in any of the three functions undermines the other two functions, and if it goes unchecked, can end in the demise of the organization. That's exactly what happened in the case of Eastman Kodak.
In its early days, the company excelled in all three functions. In the social area, it generated thousands of jobs; and contributed resources to the national, state, and the local, Rochester, community. In the managerial area, it executed a shrewd marketing strategy by bundling nicely its cameras with the film processing photography technology, often giving cameras away to sell its film and processing chemicals, as Goggle (NASDAQ:GOOG), and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) have been doing these days. In the entrepreneurial area, it offered consumers innovative products that allowed them to capture everyday moments.
Over time, however, the company failed to come up with new versions of its products that will fed-off imitators, as Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) has been doing in recent years-Polaroid and Fuji's challenge is the case in point. The company further failed to leverage its core competences and capabilities in photography chemistry to expand into emerging industries, as other late 19thcentury American companies did. Corning Inc. (NYSE:GLW), for instance, survived and thrived by leveraging its core capabilities, the processing of glass substances, to develop a sting of blockbuster products, the glass for Edison's electric lamp, the traditional TV tubes, the heat-resistant glass for missiles and kitchen ware, the fiber-optic cables that
power the Internet, and the glass for flat panel TVs. Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) has also survived and prospered by constantly replenishing and expanding its product portfolio to address emerging consumer needs.
The Bottom Line: Eastman Kodak's decline and fall is a failure of its leaders to develop the appropriate buffers to keep competition from imitating and replicating its strategy; and to match effectively corporate resources and capabilities with emerging market opportunities-an entrepreneurial failure that eventually undermined its other two functions, leading to its demise.
hey guys mera sbi ka gate band ho gaya...got 46.25...ab IBPS crack karna hai...kaun sa mock test buy karu?...koi suggestion. THANKS
heyy guys please help
how to prepare Machine Input and from which book?
please help
#Offtopic.
Is there anyone who is also going to appear for various MBA entrance examinations?
Answer the questions on the basis of the information given below.
Anuj, Abhishek, Aastha, Ankita, Abhinav, Akshita, Aman and Akanksha are working for the following companies. Airtel, ONGC, IOC, Infosys, ICICI Bank, Citi Bank, TCS and Vodafone. Each person is working for only one company and no two persons are employed by the same company.
These eight persons have the following relationships among them.
(i) There are two married couples among them.
(ii) The one working for ONGC is the sister-in-law of Aastha. The one working for IOC is brother-in-law of Anuj.
(iii) There is only one pair of siblings among them. Akanksha is the only daughter of Anuj and is working for Airtel. Akshita's paternal grandfather is working for TCS.
(iv) Abhinav's only child is working for Infosys and his daughter-in-law is Ankita.
(v) The one working for Citibank is married to Aman. Abhinav is not working for ICICI Bank.
(vi) Abhishek, Anuj, Abhinav and Aman are males and Aastha, Ankita, Akshita and Akanksha are females.
1)Which of the following is a married couple?
(a) Anuj - Aastha (b) Ankita - Aman (c) Akshita - Abhinav (d) Aman - Aastha (e) None of these
2)For which company does Aman work?
(a) ICICI Bank (b) TCS (c) IOC (d) Citi Bank (e) None of these
3)How is Abhishek related to Anuj and Aastha?
(a) Father-in-law (b) Father (c) Uncle (d) Grandfather (e) None of these
4)How is Ankita related to Akshita?
(a) Aunt (b) Sister (c) Cousin (d) Mother (e) Sister-in-law
5)Who is working for ICICI Bank?
(a) Abhishek (b) Aastha (c) Abhinav (d) Aman (e) Akshita
essay on net neutrality (400 words 32 min taken)
A world without internet cannot be imagined today. The Internet is the most important development in the history of human communication. The underlying principle on which the internet was developed was that it is free for all space otherwise it would have been a large cluster of different networks. Net Neutrality Violation will grossly defeat the core principle of the internet and will cause irreparable damage to its core. What is net neutrality and Why should we care? Was the burning issue on social media when TRAI recently asked for public opinion while issuing a consultation paper on regulatory framework on over the top services like watsapp,Viber and skype.
Net neutrality is simplistic words is considering all data and websites equally accessable .Net neutrality ensures that all websites,application etc are considered the same and equal resources is given to them.Now one may be intrigued as why would TRAI would think of touching this even playing field at all.The answer lies with internet services provider and telecom companies which have been lobbying for charging these ott services extra ie one has to pay extra in order to use these services.For telecom operators it is open and shut case,their argument being that they have to cough up enormous amount to buy spectrum ,to provide the infrastructure etc and otp services like watsapp, viber etc who are using their resources are making them redundant .Hearing this argument this may seem like a legit step but one should also keep in mind that data usages of consumers are going north and infact is stout earning source for telecom companies.
Another idea that is being floated around is zero plans,for ex airtel zero.In such plans telecom companies will charge the ott service provider and in return their consumer can access it for free.Now this might seem as an innocuous step to consumer at first but in long run burden of that charge given to telecom companied by otp service provider is bound to come upon the consumer.Moreover it kills the business prospects of any rival start up company.For ex a company like watsapp could pay a telecom company and in return their app will be free to use where as a rival start up which may not have the same resources will be provided with discriminated charges.This will kill the idea of internet based entreprenourship.
Thus to conclude the argument of telecom companies is debatable but the internet shouldnot be touched in any way.Afterall this is one place where nobody is discriminated.
Please review.Any constructive criticism,Any missed point etc
@Rohit143 @raring_utk @nammekyarkhahai @PiMolitor @Gobuaa @mailmishrar @netsavvy
Guys which mock would be better for mains? PracticeMock or OB?
Further, where can we get a rich source for GK and marketing?