SBI ka Ghamand aur hamari jhanndd 😄 😄 😄 😄
Jb hum cocacola ki bottle ko hilate hai to wo bahar aa jati hai , par jb pani ki bottle ko hilate hai toh wo bahar nhi ati . ye log ye duniya tmhe hilayenge par yad rakho tum pani ho cocacola nhi
It is your disability that you can't handle a situation.
i doubt whether the bald headed scale 3 officers invigilating in the exam yesterday could clear any of the sections . its a curse to b born in the 90s and bigger curse is to b average talented and a disgrace if u r a general candidate . sala kabhi kabhi man karta hai 10th floor pe chad jaoon .. this is not fair . i cant fight my opponents with a carrot in hand with them having a sword . bhad me jaye competitives.
yours sincerely
SARKARI ACHUT
Attempt in DI
- 5-10
- 15-20
- 0-5
- 10-15
- 20+
0 voters
English me - unfortunately it is very common these days ka opposite once in a blue moon hai na?
Kal ka paper dene ka baad kuch bhi bolne ka mood nhi kar raha hai ab ...yaadein taaza ho gyi hain fir se ek baar ....similar situation was in ibps po 2016 ...i needed just 50 marks in interview to get selected .....and i was sure that i am selected because my interview was not great but fairly well........but destiny showed its true colour ......i got 40 in interview and hence not selected ...kal bhi bilkul same hua i have a gut feeling that i am 15-20 marks above the cut-off marks .....but darta hun ...is baar agar history repeat hui to main pura toot jaunga
Jo log appear nahi huye the unke liye.Ye ek RC thi kal wale exam ki.Aur ye easy wali thi.Dusra jo aaya tha woh pura technical finance tha. 😂
Paragraph 1
At a global financial services firm we worked with, a longtime customer accidentally submitted the same application file to two offices. Though the employees who reviewed the file were supposed to follow the same guidelines—and thus arrive at similar outcomes—the separate offices returned very different quotes. Taken aback, the customer gave the business to a competitor. From the point of view of the firm, employees in the same role should have been interchangeable, but in this case they were not. Unfortunately, this is a common problem.
Paragraph 2
Professionals in many organizations are assigned arbitrarily to cases: appraisers in credit-rating agencies, physicians in emergency rooms, underwriters of loans and insurance, and others. Organizations expect consistency from these professionals: Identical cases should be treated similarly, if not identically. The problem is that humans are unreliable decision makers; their judgments are strongly influenced by irrelevant factors, such as their current mood, the time since their last meal, and the weather. We call the chance variability of judgments noise. It is an invisible tax on the bottom line of many companies.
Paragraph 3
Some jobs are noise-free. Clerks at a bank or a post office perform complex tasks, but they must follow strict rules that limit subjective judgment and guarantee, by design, that identical cases will be treated identically. In contrast, medical professionals, loan officers, project managers, judges, and executives all make judgment calls, which are guided by informal experience and general principles rather than by rigid rules. And if they don’t reach precisely the same answer that every other person in their role would, that’s acceptable; this is what we mean when we say that a decision is “a matter of judgment.” A firm whose employees exercise judgment does not expect decisions to be entirely free of noise. But often noise is far above the level that executives would consider tolerable—and they are completely unaware of it.
Paragraph 4
The prevalence of noise has been demonstrated in several studies. Academic researchers have repeatedly confirmed that professionals often contradict their own prior judgments when given the same data on different occasions. For instance, when software developers were asked on two separate days to estimate the completion time for a given task, the hours they projected differed by 71%, on average.Research has confirmed that in many tasks, experts’ decisions are highly variable: valuing stocks, appraising real estate, sentencing criminals, evaluating job performance,auditing financial statements, and more. The unavoidable conclusion is that professionals often make decisions that deviate significantly from those of their peers, from their own prior decisions, and from rules that they themselves claim to follow.
Paragraph 5
Noise is often insidious: It causes even successful companies to lose substantial amounts of money without realizing it. How substantial? To get an estimate, we asked executives in one of the organizations we studied the following: “Suppose the optimal assessment of a case is $100,000. What would be the cost to the organization if the professional in charge of the case assessed a value of $115,000? What would be the cost of assessing it at $85,000?” The cost estimates were high. Aggregated over the assessments made every year, the cost of noise was measured in billions—an unacceptable number even for a large global firm. The value of reducing noise even by a few percentage points would be in the tens of millions. Remarkably, the organization had completely ignored the question of consistency until then.
Paragraph 6
It has long been known that predictions and decisions generated by simple statistical algorithms are often more accurate than those made by experts, even when the experts have access to more information than the formulas use. It is less well known that the key advantage of algorithms is that they are noise-free: Unlike humans, a formula will always return the same output for any given input. Superior consistency allows even simple and imperfect algorithms to achieve greater accuracy than human professionals.
Is article ko 4 logon ne likha hai isiliye shayad fragmented form me puchha gaya tha!
Aur ye dusra RC.Iska jo pehla para hai woh exam me nahi aaya tha aur usme seedhe-seedhe options hai saare Qs ke.
I am expecting R- 20 Ga - 5 Eng - 10 Di - 10 Sc candidate All total min 45 marks. This exam was a reality check. I was taking ga lightly but its gonna ruin my sbi po aspirations. My one year effort is down the drain. Got rbi lined up. Still cant find the Courage and will to forget this and study for rbi .
Have been a silent reader throughout but today i just wanted to post because I want to share my feelings and feel it is tough to make my family understand the difficulty level of DI. My other sections were fine but DI just ruined everything for me. I could only do guess work mostly and i read many posts here that basics should be clear and all but I feel everyone is not equally good in everything. Including arithmetic like boats and all is making is misreable for students who depend on DI.
Sorry for the long post, and i know most might not read coz all are equally frustrated but its okk as i am really depressed and just wanted to share with someone. :( Feel like quitting and be sufficed with pnb clerk coz these days high aspirations are not worth anything :(
Pichli baar se jyada vacancies hai kya iss baar? Koi bataega kya plz
2 hours 5 minutes tha koi
0 voters
Train A and B . Stations P and Q. Trains moving towards each other. Was the relative speed 36kmph?
Comparison of quantities. Two parallel lines. Angle a, angle S. What was the answer?
does anyone remember the data sufficiency question N/10+M/10=integer and N/7+M/10=integer is N is an integer
What about time and work data sufficency? A and B work for 6 days and leave. Remaining completed by C in 12 days. 3 statements were there. I marked - Any two of the three.
Probability k answers yaad h kisi ko?
comparison..q1 was MP(side of the rectangle)..it was 11 right?
I am not opposed to those who have got reservation but many friends of me who belong to category class, went to better school than me, have better economical family background than me still they take leverage of reservation in every field. Even I haven't seen any OBC candidate who declare himself as creamy layer.