How to find the velocity ratio directly in this question?
One of the diagonal of a rhombus is 70% of the other diagonal. What is the ratio of area of rhombus to the square of the length of the larger diagonal?
5 years ago the average age of a family which includes father, mother and a son was 35 years. 3 years ago the average age of father and mother was 46 years. What is the present age (in years) of the son?
Kiran + 15 mocks. 160 ban skte hai quant me isse?
- 50-50 hai
- araam se
- 150 se upar ni jayenge
0 voters
87.
Time pass poll. Choose your preference....
and also mention the posts of CGL which are better and the posts which are lower than RBI Assistant.
- RBI Assistant
- CGL
0 voters
The commission at the rate of 10% is given to bookseller on MP of price of book by the publisher, and the publisher gains 20%. If the commission is increased to 15%, gain percent? (QUESTION KO EXPLAIN KRDO MEANING SAMAJH NAHI AA RAHA)
AAj Tiranga Yatra Nikal rahe aur Bharat Mata ki Jai nare lagane walon par UP mein Samuday Vishesh ke logon ne firing kar di...ek ki maut ho gayi....samuday vishesh ke logon ne pakistan zindabad ke naare bhi lagaye....aapko kya lagta hai ki samuday vishesh ke YE bhatke hue yuva kabhi sudhrenge
- bhatke hue hain sudhar jayenge
- Nahi Sudhrenge, latkhor hain
0 voters
ये normalization वाले साले फण्ड है मागते रहते है लगता है engineering की जगह लॉ किया होता तो आज इन जिसो की बदौलत लाखो में खेलता
Can someone tell me if the maths and english exam will take place in a single day for tier 2. Actually I'll be having my training at that time and taking leaves will be very difficult. Any help would be appreciated.
In a colored picture of blue and yellow color, blue and yellow color is used in the ratio of 4:3 respectively. If in upper half, blue : yellow is 2:3, then in the lower half blue : yellow is
Unemployment is at its peak and even then dont know how is BJP coming again in 2019 and that too with so heavy majority...i have seriously no clue man....
He said to us "What did he have last night ?"
Sentence improvement.
No sooner had the destruction completed,than mother walked in.
Gali wali dene wale kripya door rhe .Karni sena -rajput gundey .man killed with gun in up-do guto ke beech hinsak jhadap .media doesn't have guts to say a particular name.ab tak samuday khte the aaj se naya shuru kia h sabne 2 guto😂. Yaha me koi politics nahi kr rha par kuch dino se jis tarah se rajputo ko dikhaya ja rha h .ham ese bilkul nahi h itihas utha ke dekh lo hindustan ki hifazat agar kisi jati ne ki h to wo h ham RAJPUT.ha tod fod krna darana dhamkana galat h par jis tarah se ye sab bola ja rha h galat h. I AM PROUD TO BE A RAJPUT.
A sum of Rs 15525 is divided among Sunil, Anil and Jamil such that if Rs 22, Rs 35 and Rs 48 be diminished from their shares respectively, their remaining sums shall be in the ratio 7:10:13. What would have been the ratio of their sums if Rs 16, Rs 77 and Rs 37 respectively were added to their original shares?
1) 9:13:17
2) 18:26:35
3) 36:52:67
4) None of these
The crime rate increases inspite(A)/formal moral education(B)/given in schools(C)/NE
Can anyone please explain how to solve this kind of question?
A thousand years ago, Rajput kings ruled much of North India. Then they lost to Ghazni, lost to Ghuri, lost to Khilji, lost to Babur, lost to Akbar, lost to the Marathas, and keeled over before the British. The Marathas and Brits hardly count since the Rajputs were a spent force by the time Akbar was done with them. Having been confined to an arid part of the subcontinent by the early Sultans, they were reduced to vassals by the Mughals.
The three most famous Rajput heroes not only took a beating in crucial engagements, but also retreated from the field of battle. Prithviraj Chauhan was captured while bolting and executed after the second battle of Tarain in 1192 CE, while Rana Sanga got away after losing to Babur at Khanua in 1527, as did Rana Pratap after the battle of Haldighati in 1576. To compensate for, or explain away, these debacles, the bards of Rajputana replaced history with legend.
Specialists in failure
It is worth asking, surely, what made Rajputs such specialists in failure. Yet, the question hardly ever comes up. When it does, the usual explanation is that the Rajputs faced Muslim invaders whose fanaticism was their strength. Nothing could be further than the truth. Muslim rulers did use the language of faith to energise their troops, but commitment is only the first step to victory. The Rajputs themselves never lacked commitment, and their courage invariably drew the praise of their enemies. Even a historian as fundamentalist as Badayuni rhapsodised about Rajput valour. Babur wrote that his troops were unnerved, ahead of the Khanua engagement, by the reputed fierceness of Rana Sanga’s forces, their willingness to fight to the death.
Let’s cancel out courage and fanaticism as explanations, then, for each side displayed these in equal measure. What remains is discipline, technical and technological prowess, and tactical acumen. In each of these departments, the Rajputs were found wanting. Their opponents, usually Turkic, used a complex battle plan involving up to five different divisions. Fleet, mounted archers would harry opponents at the start, and often make a strategic retreat, inducing their enemy to charge into an ambush. Behind these stood the central division and two flanks. While the centre absorbed the brunt of the enemy’s thrust, the flanks would wheel around to surround and hem in opponents. Finally, there was a reserve that could be pressed into action wherever necessary. Communication channels between divisions were quick and answered to a clear hierarchy that was based largely on merit.
Contrast this with the Rajput system, which was simple, predictable, and profoundly foolish, consisting of a headlong attack with no Plan B. In campaigns against forces that had come through the Khyber Pass, Rajputs usually had a massive numerical advantage. Prithviraj’s troops outnumbered Ghuri’s at the second battle of Tarain by perhaps three to one. At Khanua, Rana Sanga commanded at least four soldiers for every one available to Babur. Unlike Sanga’s forces, though, Babur’s were hardy veterans. After defeating Ibrahim Lodi at Panipat, the founder of the Mughal dynasty had the option of using the generals he inherited from the Delhi Sultan, but preferred to stick with soldiers he trusted. He knew numbers are meaningless except when acting on a coherent strategy under a unified command. Rajput troops rarely answered to one leader, because each member of the confederacy would have his own prestige and ego to uphold. Caste considerations made meritocracy impossible. The enemy general might be a freed Abyssinian slave, but Rajput leadership was decided by clan membership.
Absent meritocratic promotion, an established chain of command, a good communication system, and a contingency plan, Rajput forces were regularly taken apart by the opposition’s mobile cavalry. Occasionally, as with the composite bows and light armour of Ghuri’s horsemen, or the matchlocks employed by Babur, technological advances played a role in the outcome.
Ossified tactics
What’s astonishing is that centuries of being out-thought and out-manoeuvred had no impact on the Rajput approach to war. Rana Pratap used precisely the same full frontal attack at Haldighati in 1576 that had failed so often before. Haldighati was a minor clash by the standards of Tarain and Khanua. Pratap was at the head of perhaps 3,000 men and faced about 5,000 Mughal troops. The encounter was far from the Hindu Rajput versus Muslim confrontation it is often made out to be. Rana Pratap had on his side a force of Bhil archers, as well as the assistance of Hakim Shah of the Sur clan, which had ruled North India before Akbar’s rise to power. Man Singh, a Rajput who had accepted Akbar’s suzerainty and adopted the Turko-Mongol battle plan led the Mughal troops. Though Pratap’s continued rebellion following his defeat at Haldighati was admirable in many ways, he was never anything more than an annoyance to the Mughal army. That he is now placed, in the minds of many Indians, on par with Akbar or on a higher plane says much about the twisted communal politics of the subcontinent.
There’s one other factor that is thought to have contributed substantially to Rajput defeats: the opium habit. Taking opium was established practice among Rajputs in any case, but they considerably upped the quantity they consumed when going into battle. Several ended up in no fit state to process any instruction beyond, “kill or be killed”. Opium rendered some soldiers incapable of coordinating complex manoeuvres. There’s an apt warning for school kids: don’t do drugs, or you’ll squander an empire.
Gand mai nahi dum movie ban karne chale hum lol
- Maratha and British was not even considered them worthy enough
- yeas they lost all wars and married their girls to most mughals
- so Rajput are shit yeah
0
voters
guys ..as case of hearing is 15 do u think ssc will be able to conduct the exam on 18 ...