@allan89 4,4,4,2:splat:
@allan89 4,4,3,2
Very gud RC with close options...whats the source of this RC..??
It feels lyk i have read something lyk this b4...
@allan89 D,D,B(??),D(??).
Q3 I would have skipped in an exam scenario, can't figure out the difference between statement C and D. :S Even the 4th one is very iffy, dunno if "National Pride" is implied when the author says the citizens assert their American-ness even if they are rioting. :P
Q3 I would have skipped in an exam scenario, can't figure out the difference between statement C and D. :S Even the 4th one is very iffy, dunno if "National Pride" is implied when the author says the citizens assert their American-ness even if they are rioting. :P
my take 4 4 1 4
@allan89 4,4,3,2ďťż
good RC...
Koi iska approach bata do pls
Net cnnection problems...LOlz............
OA .. 4 ,4 2,4.......................
29.4. The author is exploring why patriotism in America is different
and more inclusive as compared to that in Australia and Europe.
This is the main theme. The author also shows a slight
preference of American Patriotism to that of Europe and
Australia. This leads us to option 4. Option 1 is not the primary
objective of the author. The author does not use harsh words
to criticize Europe or Australia. Option 2 is too general. The
attempt is not to learn but to study the difference in patriotism
among America, Australia and Europe. Option 3 again is part
of the discussion but does not encompass the whole of the
passage.
30. 4 The context here is that nations like America have been created
from migration and settlement and hence there is nothing
organic about them. 'Organic' in the context would take a
sense of 'having a common history/tradition/culture/ ancestry'
for the people of a particular country (of the 'New World').
Option 1 conveys the opposite of the intended meaning. Option
2 is incorrect as we are talking of common principles/ tradition/
evolution and not 'rigid principles'. As regards option 3, the
author is not worried about the outlook of people— whether
they are traditional /modern in outlook. But he is definitely
indicating that the entire population has not evolved in a similar
way and the people do not have a common history, which
renders 4 correct.
31. 2 Statements B, C and D are implied by the author in the fourth
paragraph where the author brings out the similarities between
US and Australian backgrounds as opposed to that of Europe.
A can be eliminated as it speaks about a characteristic that is
peculiar only to the US.
32. 4 Option 1 can be inferred from Para 2. Option 2 can be inferred
from the 3rd paragraph. Option 3 can be inferred from the last
2 paras of the passage.
@FSOG said:sir woh batao...diffeerent number of regions created.....
sir bolkar aap mujhse sharminda na kare.... different number of regions created when all are non-parallel non-concurrent are n(n+1)/2 + 1 ... if u ever forget this formula.. and u need to crosscheck den u can check dat 2 lines create 4 regions, 3 create 7... hence this formula
for n concurrent lines.. regions created are 2n..
incase n parallel lines regions created are n+1
@allan89 said:Net cnnection problems...LOlz............OA .. 4 ,4 2,4.......................29.4. The author is exploring why patriotism in America is differentand more inclusive as compared to that in Australia and Europe.This is the main theme. The author also shows a slightpreference of American Patriotism to that of Europe andAustralia. This leads us to option 4. Option 1 is not the primaryobjective of the author. The author does not use harsh wordsto criticize Europe or Australia. Option 2 is too general. Theattempt is not to learn but to study the difference in patriotismamong America, Australia and Europe. Option 3 again is partof the discussion but does not encompass the whole of thepassage.30. 4 The context here is that nations like America have been createdfrom migration and settlement and hence there is nothingorganic about them. 'Organic' in the context would take asense of 'having a common history/tradition/culture/ ancestry'for the people of a particular country (of the 'New World').Option 1 conveys the opposite of the intended meaning. Option2 is incorrect as we are talking of common principles/ tradition/evolution and not 'rigid principles'. As regards option 3, theauthor is not worried about the outlook of people— whetherthey are traditional /modern in outlook. But he is definitelyindicating that the entire population has not evolved in a similarway and the people do not have a common history, whichrenders 4 correct.31. 2 Statements B, C and D are implied by the author in the fourthparagraph where the author brings out the similarities betweenUS and Australian backgrounds as opposed to that of Europe.A can be eliminated as it speaks about a characteristic that ispeculiar only to the US.32. 4 Option 1 can be inferred from Para 2. Option 2 can be inferredfrom the 3rd paragraph. Option 3 can be inferred from the last2 paras of the passage.
But just a small doubt...in the last question it says which of these cannot be inferred...option 4 says none of the above...so i thot it meant we cannot infer anything...i was sure of 1 and 3...so dint bother to chek for 2 and marked it...the options are ambiguous in this case...