Any court news about trb Polytechnic...........
Madurai high court judgement copy This Court is of the view that Teachers Recruitment Board has needlessly pressed the panic button. This Court also expresses its disapproval of the reason set out in Para.12 of the counter. 21.Therefore, this Court quashes the decision of the Teachers Recruitment Board to cancel the entire examination. The Board shall proceed from the stage where the mistake crept in. It shall re-evaluate all the answer sheets afresh. This shall be carried out within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Of course, the certificate verification process shall have to be re-done. As a result, all these writ petitions are partly allowed. No costs. Consequently, all the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 22.02.2018 Skm To 1.The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor, E.V.K.Sampath Maligai, College Road, Chennai – 6. 3.The Member Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor, E.V.K.Sampath Maligai, College Road, Chennai. http://www.judis.nic.in
OMR tampering will not beneficial for culprits. First he should know the highest mark then only he can relatively place the culprits. Think, If he does not know the highest mark then he can't confidently place the culprits, one option is give highest mark to all the culprits this will lead to suspicious, so he will not do it. Another option is, give mark based on money, for this also he should know the highest mark then only culprit will benefit. Blindly no one pay mony like 25L. If he paid means some how he should be in top order otherwise he will not pay. So after evaluation only the culprit decided the marks. Here there is no use by tampring OMR. assume he tampered OMR after knowing the highest mark then he need to make two copy one for valuation and another for TRB copy. This becomes tedious work also the risk, for this he needs the help of TRB higher officials I am sure they will not do this bacause they also came through competitive exam so they knows the value. Some one who does not know this value he will do this like not even passing 10th std.
It's better to conduct stage II exam instead of reexam ..... This will eliminate frauds who are in top order..... What is ur idea?????
What RamGopal posted are absolutely valid points....If OMR tampering has been done, it should have been done even for the fradulents whose marks had been inflated in the old cv list. Am I correct! Without knowing the maximum mark among the genuine candidate's marks (it can be known only after evaluation), how does it possible and what is the use of sandwitching the fake OMR sheets? Even if one thinks that there is a insertion of fake OMR sheets, the correponding candidates (atleast some considerable number of candidates) might have taken marks more than 160. Finally, if one thinks that OMR tampering has been done in this exam, it would have happened in all the previous exams (PG trb, Engg recruitment and etc) and even one can doubt in this way for all the future exams which are going to be conducted by the stupid TRB. I really really fed up bro....
They have posted annual planner......and not canceld........when will the court send judgement copy to trb.........what is the current update......when this problem will be solved........ please post.......thank you
This Court is therefore of the view that it is possible to segregate the non-tainted stages of the selection process from the subsequent stage of evaluation. When admittedly the examination was conducted in a proper manner, it is not fair on the part of the Board to make the candidates to sit for examination once again. It is true that the petitioners have no indefeasible right to be selected. They have only been called for certificate verification. No substantive rights have accrued in their favour. But, in this case the issue is to be viewed from another perspective. The question is not whether the rights of the petitioners have been infringed or not. The question is whether the decision of the Teachers Recruitment Board to cancel the entire selection process is fair or not.
Anyone know about today hearing details.
Today which time polytechnic case hearing...
Case number 5803/2018 ah friends..
Any body from lawyer background.......please update about trb Polytechnic......case
Any one know about today hearing ?
Case hearing come today friends
When they are calling for next recruitment
Outsider allowed in tnpsc assistant engineer civil??
kadavul irukkaan kumaru...
the govt had submitted appeal on madhurai hc verdict and new points added, 1 hearing over by now ..next hearing on april 9 http://www.judis.nic.in/....i found case details as follows...go to this site....search petitioner as state of tamilnadu, give date limit march 5 to march 22, from that a list of cases will come , then find our case
I tried posting full text but couldn't paste the whole hearing order copy...court send notice to Illamathi to attend on April 9
4.The examination was conducted on 16th of September, 2017. When the process of evaluation of the answer-sheets was in progress, a number of writ applications were filed by the unsuccessful candidates demanding cancellation of the result whereas; some others were filed for declaration of the result.
6.In the present case, the Commission has formed opinion on the basis of the reports by CCB received by it that its examination process has not been fair and it will not inspire confidence in the mind of the candidates. Therefore, to bring transparency, probity and fairness in the selection process, the Commission has decided to conduct fresh examination. Such action cannot be said to be arbitrary, irrational and unjustified which may warrant interference in exercise of power of judicial review by this Court. In fact, even if the answer sheet of one candidate has been tampered with, it is good cause for cancellation of the examination process as exclusion of such candidate would be unfair action of the Commission.
9. The CCB has, inter alia, noticed the High Court that the OMR sheets were violated/tampered in one form or the other. The govt framed an opinion that faith in such examination has to be restored and by segregating the so-called untainted from the tainted will always leave a lurking doubt in the mind of the candidates about fairness in evaluation so made.
The stand of the learned counsel appearing for the Commission is that keeping in view the allegations in the process of examination; it has been decided to conduct the re-examination of all the candidates so as to restore faith of the candidates in the examination process.
15. A person whose name appears in the select list does not acquire any indefeasible right of appointment. Empanelment at the best is a condition of eligibility for the purpose of appointment and by itself does not amount to selection or create a vested right to be appointed. The vacancies have to be filled up as per the statutory rules and in conformity with the constitutional mandate.....
16. A select list cannot be treated as a reservoir for the purpose of appointments, that vacancy can be filled up taking the names from that list as and when it is so required...."
18. The learned counsel standing counsel /Special Govt Pleader states that there will be fresh examination process in pursuance to the advertisement to be published on May 1st week ,reexam on August 04 2018 after cancellation of the examination conducted on 16th of September, 2017as well. The fresh examination process and posting shall be completed within a period of four months
Hai anbarassu case number post.... Which court madras or Madurai
There are 4 petitioners, search in the same link by the free text search keyword Polytechnic. Date from 22 feb to 07 mar. Then why only to illamathi. I searched i did not find your's post anbaraasu.
What is the use of clearing SLET exam? I cleared it in the year 2016.