Also the omr was scanned and taken as soft copy by the private company.
TRB also has a soft copy of scanned documents.
(This was released by trb website, so we found discrepencies in fake marks in CV)
So, First KEY was released,
Because only after the key was made and a Rough CV list is be prepared, they could have calculated what marks to put for scamster candidates.
For example, if fisrt marks is 150, they need to know this, before trying to give a scam candidate, say 170.(doubts will arise)
similarly, if least mark in cv list is, say 70 they need to know this also, if not they will give scam candidate 65 or less.(which will be of no use)
So,
1)First they scanned the OMR sheets,
2)Took the soft copy,
3)prepared rough list,
4)and inserted fake marks for scamster candidates, so that they fall within range of CV list.
So, till key was released the scamsters itself didn't know what fake marks to enter for scam candidates. And what about carbon copy? They can use that to verify genuine candidates.
anbarasangentle
(பாலிடெக்னிக் விரிவுரையாளர் தேர்வு Dec18 )
468
Nooru சதவிகிதம் மறுதேர்வு நடப்பது uruthi .. மதுரை HC not give final judjement. It ஜஸ்ட் temprary stay the trb notification. போஸ்டபோன் the hearing to june 8. Its not a judgement. But Madras HC gave a final judgement.after observe CCB 's 800 page ரிப்போர்ட். Aug exam confirmed.
Strict to basics: TRB itself said 1. no question and answer leakage 2. no mass copying 3. no OMR tampering. Now they are contradicting on 3rd point. When they are talking about OMR tampering, they are pointing out the finger towards CCB. But we should get answer from TRB chairman for this question: "whether the hard original OMR sheets are tampered or not". Because in juddgement copy, it is not clear: whether it is hard one or soft copy. TRB have all responsibilty to secure OMRs. IF TRB accept that "the hard original OMR sheets are got tampered", then our immediate question is "how does it get tampered?". We should not say 'this or that might happened" but TRB should answer this. But TRB can't say "TRB is not in a position to say".
In order to find only 2110 top most quality diamonds, I had given 133568 stones (time and effort) to expert-1 (I thought he is an expert) based on aggrement-1. In turn, he (expert-I) is asking expert-2 to come and find them with an aggrement-2. At expert-1 premises, Expert-2 scanned all those stones in front of expert-1 and went away with his observed records (scanned copies). After some days when I asked for the top quality diamonds, expert-1 used to say that “expert-2 mixed some diamond coated salt crystals into them, and I am able to segregate only 196 salt crystals and some more salt crystals are also mixed there”. So expert-1 says that he had scrapped everything and asking me again to give another set of stones and saying: this time I will do without any mistakes. This is up to you, whether you will give further chance or not in future. I have to analyze the things and mistakes happened so far. It clearly shows the total irresponsibility of expert-1 being a model employer. It does show not only his irresponsibility, but also his violation of the aggrement-1. Since he has violated the aggrement-1, we have to punish him severely. But nobody is interested as well as ready to punish him, simply he has been escaping narrowly and blaming expert-2 with the help of investigating and judicial authorities. Let it be apart. Here our important job is to prove that aggrement-1 and aggrement-2 both are independent and hence it will not affect with one another. If we proved this then we can clearly state that actually the mixing done by expert-1 not by exper-2 alone. Or Exper-1 might have done this only with the help of expert-2. Anyway without the involvement of expert-1 this could not happened. I believe that aggrement-1 is surely independent of aggrement-2 because expert-2 is doing everything in front of expert-1. Once we proved that expert-1 is accused then hereafter expert-1’s duty to segregate the rest of the salt crystals. If not, then we have to request to give those stones to expert-3(forensic department or any other method) to segregate rest of the salt-crystals if it exist.
Conclusion: So without suspecting or accusing expert-1, it is impossible to get prober justice.
So far no TRB officials has been arrested. That means everything proper at TRB side. Eventhough proper, OMR tampering happened. how? where? when? We have to ask 4 chairmen(Jegannathan, Srinivasan, Nandhakumar, Jeyanthi) and Member Secratary(Uma) to submit pramana pathiram regard this. Some officials from Education department has been arrested but they are accused for acted as middlemen as pr CCB statement.
hi i m preparing a video for MECHANICAL TRB students who do no how to start.....this video i explain the waitage of each topic ...u can watch and get clear idea about the waitage of each topics