Judgement out aah
Supreme court has confirmed the GO of Tamilnadu Government on TRB Polytechnic Lecturer case
Judgement out - RE EXAM
Re Exam is the Supreme Court Judgement.....
Lets Rock the day....
Guys, don't fade away. Get ready for the upcoming exam. We can, we will. முயற்சி உடையார் இகழ்ச்சி அடையார்
feeling sorry for genuine candidates 🙏 wish you all get the job again in re-exam
fake gov, fake justice
இந்த நாடும் நாட்டு மக்களும் நாசமாய் போகட்டும்... 😡😡😡
Those 196 members wat happened
Ok friends it's time to work hard . Exam notice will anounce soon . But they give less than month of time to exam . There is a chance to increase the vacancy. Already applied candidates excepmped from pay the fee .New candidates also 2019 passout eligible to apply. Last year 139k candidates. Two years rolled . So we expect more than 250k candidates. 📢📢📢 💐💐💐 All the best
Exam eppo irukkum
Fake judgment given by SC. No reason mentioned in judgement. Simply they assumed. But no ptoof. Not consirded crime dept nd trb chaitman report saying original OMR sheets r under safe custody.
Can someone send ece trb study material friends
It was further held in the said judgment as follows: “30. Identifying all the candidates who are guilty of malpractice either by criminal prosecution or even by an administrative enquiry is certainly a time-consuming process. If it were to be the requirement of law that such Identification of the wrongdoers is a must and only the identified wrongdoers be eliminated from the selection process, and until such identification is completed the process cannot be carried on, it would not only result in a great inconvenience to the administration, but also result in a loss of time even to the innocentcandidates. On the other hand, by virtue of theimpugned action, the innocent candidates (for the matter all the candidates including the wrongdoers) still get an opportunity of participating in the fresh examination process to be conducted by the State.” 👉May be, the candidates who had a chance of being selected and appointed as Lecturers in the Government Polytechnic Colleges on the basis of the results of the written examination would be inconvenienced due to another examination being conducted but a serious doubt entertained by the Board about the magnitude of the manipulation in the examination has to be given due weightage. 👉Having considered the merits of the case we do not approve the approach of the learned Single Judge of the Principal Bench of the Madras High Court in taking a different view with another Single Judge of the same Court. It is trite law that the matter has to be referred to a larger Bench in case of disagreement by a Coordinate Bench of equal strength. 👉 In view of the aforementioned, we set aside the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court.The appeals are allowed. …................................J. [L. NAGESWARA RAO] …….............................J. [HEMANT GUPTA] New Delhi, August 08, 2019.
It was further held in the said judgment as follows: “30. Identifying all the candidates who are guilty of malpractice either by criminal prosecution or even by an administrative enquiry is certainly a time-consuming process. If it were to be the requirement of law that such Identification of the wrongdoers is a must and only the identified wrongdoers be eliminated from the selection process, and until such identification is completed the process cannot be carried on, it would not only result in a great inconvenience to the administration, but also result in a loss of time even to the innocentcandidates. On the other hand, by virtue of theimpugned action, the innocent candidates (for the matter all the candidates including the wrongdoers) still get an opportunity of participating in the fresh examination process to be conducted by the State.” 👉May be, the candidates who had a chance of being selected and appointed as Lecturers in the Government Polytechnic Colleges on the basis of the results of the written examination would be inconvenienced due to another examination being conducted but a serious doubt entertained by the Board about the magnitude of the manipulation in the examination has to be given due weightage. 👉Having considered the merits of the case we do not approve the approach of the learned Single Judge of the Principal Bench of the Madras High Court in taking a different view with another Single Judge of the same Court. It is trite law that the matter has to be referred to a larger Bench in case of disagreement by a Coordinate Bench of equal strength. 👉 In view of the aforementioned, we set aside the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court.The appeals are allowed. …................................J. [L. NAGESWARA RAO] …….............................J. [HEMANT GUPTA] New Delhi, August 08, 2019
இது மேலும் கூறப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பில் பின்வருமாறு நடைபெற்றது: இருக்கும் அனைத்து வேட்பாளர்களையும் அடையாளம் காணுதல் நிச்சயமாக ஒரு நேரத்தை எடுத்துக்கொள்ளும் செயல். அத்தகைய தவறு செய்பவர்களை அடையாளம் காண்பது அவசியம் மற்றும் அடையாளம் காணப்பட்ட தவறு செய்பவர்கள் மட்டுமே தேர்வு செயல்முறையிலிருந்து அகற்றப்பட வேண்டும் என்பது சட்டத்தின் தேவையாக இருக்க வேண்டும் என்றால், அத்தகைய அடையாளம் காணப்படும் வரை இந்த செயல்முறையை முன்னெடுக்க முடியாது, அது ஒரு விளைவை மட்டும் ஏற்படுத்தாது நிர்வாகத்திற்கு பெரும் சிரமமாக இருக்கிறது, ஆனால் அப்பாவி வேட்பாளர்களுக்கு கூட நேரத்தை இழக்க நேரிடும். எழுத்துத் தேர்வின் முடிவுகளின் அடிப்படையில் அரசு பாலிடெக்னிக் கல்லூரிகளில் தேர்வு செய்யப்பட்டு விரிவுரையாளர்களாக நியமிக்க வாய்ப்புள்ள வேட்பாளர்கள் சிரமத்திற்கு ஆளாக நேரிடும் மற்றொரு பரீட்சை நடத்தப்படுகிறது, ஆனால் தேர்வில் கையாளுதலின் அளவு குறித்து வாரியம் ஒரு தீவிரமான சந்தேகம் கொடுக்கப்பட வேண்டும். The வழக்கின் சிறப்பைக் கருத்தில் கொண்டு, அதே நீதிமன்றத்தின் மற்றொரு ஒற்றை நீதிபதியுடன் வித்தியாசமான கருத்தை எடுப்பதில் மெட்ராஸ் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தின் முதன்மை பெஞ்சின் கற்றறிந்த ஒற்றை நீதிபதியின் அணுகுமுறையை நாங்கள் ஏற்கவில்லை. சம வலிமை கொண்ட ஒரு ஒருங்கிணைந்த பெஞ்ச் கருத்து வேறுபாடு ஏற்பட்டால், இந்த விஷயத்தை ஒரு பெரிய பெஞ்சிற்கு குறிப்பிட வேண்டும் என்பது சாதாரண சட்டமாகும். Above மேற்கூறியவற்றின் பார்வையில், மெட்ராஸ் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தின் டிவிஷன் பெஞ்சின் தீர்ப்பை நாங்கள் ஒதுக்கி வைத்தோம். மேல்முறையீடுகள் அனுமதிக்கப்படுகின்றன. ... ................................ ஜே. [எல் நாகேஸ்வர ராவ்] ...... ............................. ஜே. [ஹேமண்ட் குப்தா] புது தில்லி, ஆகஸ்ட் 08, 201
Trb polytechnic lecture salary evalavu varum????
Other state candidate..please dont apply once if notification comes....we peoples here itself struggling more and please fight to get in ur own state....here itself we have more competitive...so shut up urs up and down and try it in ur own state
Other state candidates will also apply for the post . 69percent for Tamilnadu and 31 percentage seat for all indian including Tamilnadu . So 750 vacancy out of 1052 only for Tamil people . It's our duty to prevent them by hard working. Other state people also hard working people .
ஏன் என்று கேட்கவும் நாதியில்லை ஏழையின் நீதிக்கு கண் உண்டு பார்வையில்லை பசுவினை பாம்பென்று சாட்சி சொல்லமுடியும் காம்பினில் விஷம் என்ன கறக்கவா முடியும்?
Wh month announce trb reschedule recruitment??
In India, a binding decision of the Supreme Court/High Court can be reviewed in Review Petition. The parties aggrieved on any order of the Supreme Court on any apparent error can file a review petition. Taking into consideration the principle of stare decisis, courts generally do not unsettle a decision, without a strong case. This provision regarding review is an exemption to the legal principle of stare decisis.[1][need quotation to verify] Article 137 of the Constitution provides that subject to provisions of any law and rule made under Article 145 the Supreme Court of India has the power to review any judgement pronounced (or order made) by it. Under Supreme Court Rules, 1966 such a petition needs to be filed within 30 days from the date of judgement or order. It is also recommended that the petition should be circulated without oral arguments to the same bench of judges that delivered the judgement (or order) sought to be reviewed.