21 date wala message Kahan gaya
20 ghante ho Gaye. Abhi bhi meeting chal hi rahi hai. Meeting karwane walo kaha ho bhailog??
Correct ans pls
Correct ans?? Pls anybody explain
friends, i have called on uppcl help desk no.. they did not confirm any date for exam but told it will be updated on website very soon. they also told that admit card will be available from tomorrow onwards . you can do a check too and please comment accordingly .
Main 3saal se pagalguy pr hu pr avi mujhe gaali dene ka mn ho rha h pagalguy pr jo rumour failate hain unko...saalo ne le li.. Avi call kia tha exam 11-14 hi h 21 nov 26 nov walo thoda sharm kro Hm 20 din hi pdte h usme se 12din pagalguy ne le lia.. Kisi pr bharosa krna bekar jb tk official notification na aaye..aaj smjh aayi a baat
Kya hua tera wada ?
Meri to saari hopes chali gayi , ab 7 din mai kaise syllabus karu , kya padu kya chodu ?
Bhailog exact date Kya ho sakti hai?. 13 aya hai samne ek date
YOU are preparing for uppcl according to ---
- UPPCL syllabus
- WHOLE syllabus
0 voters
Now i understand , how riots spread on the basis of rumours.
eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System (Judgment/Order in Text Format) This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Deputy Registrar(Copying).HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No.6
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 27243 Of 2003
Arun Kumar............................................................Petitioner
Vs.
U.P.Awas Vikas Parishad and others............................ Respondents.
...
Hon. Tarun Agarwala,J.
Heard Sri V. Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anand Prakash Srivastava, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos.1 and 2, namely, U.P. Awas Vikas Parishad.
It transpires that the respondents placed an advertisement for the appointment on the post of a Junior Engineer. The qualification required was a diploma in Civil Engineering from a recognized institution. The petitioner had passed his B.Sc. Examination from Rohilkhand University and had also completed his B.Tech from Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur which is also a recognized institution. The petitioner applied for the said post but his candidature was rejected and was not called for the interview for reasons best known to the respondents. Consequently, the petitioner filed the present writ petition praying for a direction that he may be permitted to appear in the interview and that the respondents should consider the case of the petitioner on the post of Junior Engineer.
This Court by an interim order dated 2.7.2003 directed the petitioner to appear in the interview provisionally and the selection, if any, was made subject to result of the writ petition.
Based on the interim order, the petitioner was permitted to appear in the interview. 31 posts for Junior Engineer was advertised out of which the result of 30 seats have been declared and appointments have been made and one seat in the O.B.C. category has not been declared so far, due to the interim order passed by this Court
The advertisement states that the qualification required for the post of Junior Engineer is a diploma in Civil Engineering from a recognised institution. On the other hand, the petitioner holds a higher qualification, namely, a decree of Bachelor of Technology in the Civil Engineering which according to the petitioner is a higher qualification than that of a diploma in Civil Engineering. The question which arises for consideration, is whether the requisite qualification is only required for the post of Junior Engineer or whether a person holding a higher qualification could also apply and be eligible for the consideration on the said post ?
In my view, the qualification so mentioned in the advertisement is the minimum qualification that is required for the said post and cannot be considered to be the maximum qualification. Consequently, the petitioner holding a higher qualification would be eligible for consideration on the post of Junior Engineer. The action of the respondents in not calling the petitioner for the interview on the ground that he was over qualified is patently misconceived. In my view, the petitioner cannot be disqualified, merely, because he was over qualified, rather the respondents should have given weightage to the fact that the petitioner had got a higher qualification. In my opinion, the action of the respondents in not calling the petitioner for the interview is totally arbitrary and is in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Consequently, the writ petition succeeds with cost and is allowed. A mandamus is issued to the respondents to declare the result and if the petitioner is found to have been recommended by the Selection Committee, the 31st post would be filled up accordingly.
Dt.:13.9.2005
AKJ
Visithttp://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/StartWebSearch.dofor more Judgments/Orders delivered at Allahabad High Court and Its Bench at Lucknow. Disclaimer
BTECH HOLDER ALSO ELIGIBLE FOR ALL JE post see the high court order
check haryana karnataka uttrakhand court cases in which btech holder after clearing exam appointed for je post. in up it also happen so apply je post
apply in upjn je post if qualified go for high court like other uttrakhand ujvn anfd take appointment.
overqualification not a problem only problem bro we follows like a system if phd person go for peon post why we should not take je post keep apply in huge.
Admit card aa gaya ...12 Nov.. timing 2 pm
Admit card released UPPCL AE Electrical my exam date, 12 Nov
Ae Civil engg ka paper kis date ko hai