Isosceles means ONLY 2 sides equal.. and Equilateral means ALL sides equal in length..
Isosceles is NOT same as Equilateral.. or vice versa..
According to me, All equilateral triangles are isosceles but not the vice versa. Those isosceles triangle for which the third side is equal to the other two, is equilateral. So equilateral triangle is the special case of isosceles triangle.
According to me, All equilateral triangles are isosceles but not the vice versa. Those isosceles triangle for which the third side is equal to the other two, is equilateral. So equilateral triangle is the special case of isosceles triangle.
You mean just like how square and rectangle are related.. simialr relationship between Isosceles and equilateral triangle.. possible.. π
I am not saying Isoscles triangle is equilateral triangle. What am saying is Equilateral triangle is an isosceles triangle with the third angle (first two angles are equal equal) equal to 60.
I can easily put this as a DS question.
I agree that an equilateral triage is an isosceles triangle with its third angle also same as other two. My concern was 'Exactly two of the angles.....'. If the statement says, exactly 2 angles are same, doesn't it mean that its saying 2 and only 2 angles are same. If so then it means its an isosceles triangle and not an equilateral.
Sorry.. my bad.. I was checking incorrectly.. I also marked the same answer as memtioned in OG...
so no worries.. try this and have fun!! Lemme know if you need any help (though it's pretty simple)
Originally Posted by nuttyvarun View Post Here's one..
If x and y are both positive integers, how much greater is x than y?
x + y = 20
x = y
I get an answer which is different from the one marked in OG. Share your thoughts!! Put the value of x in to the second one y^2+y=20 y(y+1)=20=4*5 y=4,x=16 C
But statement 1 says...Exactly two angles. Doesn't that implies that its saying that only 2 angles measures the same?
Hey! As the question mentions that "exactly two angles" are same, it is a definite isosceles triangle, without the possibility of being an equilateral.
Had it been specified that "at least two angles" are same, there could have been a possibility of considering it as an equilateral triangle. Busts the definitions we have been reading since childhood, but hope this helps:
I gave my GMAT in Sep 08; got a 650. Now I am preparing again and wish to reappear by July 09. Wanted to know if there have been any changes in the exam pattern / style of questions / language, etc since then.
I gave my GMAT in Sep 08; got a 650. Now I am preparing again and wish to reappear by July 09. Wanted to know if there have been any changes in the exam pattern / style of questions / language, etc since then.
Nishant Jain
Nishant.. WRONG thread!! ;)
Please post it in GMAT Query or some other thread to get the answer u r looking for!!
I gave my GMAT in Sep 08; got a 650. Now I am preparing again and wish to reappear by July 09. Wanted to know if there have been any changes in the exam pattern / style of questions / language, etc since then.