Official Quant thread for CAT 2013

@pankaj1988 said:
Three Professors Dr. Gupta, Dr Sharma and Dr.Singh are evaluating answer scripts of a subject.Dr. Gupta is 40% more efficient than Dr. Sharma,who is 20% more efficient than Dr. Singh. Dr. Guptatakes 10 days less than Dr. Sharma to completethe evaluation work. Dr. Gupta starts the evaluationwork and works for 10 days and then Dr. Sharmatakes over. Dr. Sharma evaluates for next 15 daysand then stops. In how many days, Dr. Singh cancomplete the remaining evaluation work.A. 7.2 days B. 9.5 daysC. 11.5 days D. None of thesewith approach
Assume the efficiencies of Gupta, Sharma and Singh be 1.4x, x and x/1.2 respectively.

Now equating the work,
xy = 1.4xy - 14x
y = 35

Therefore Singh will complete the work in 42 days.

Now 10/25 + 15/35 + d/42 = 1
On solving d= 7.2 days.
@pankaj1988 said:
Three Professors Dr. Gupta, Dr Sharma and Dr.Singh are evaluating answer scripts of a subject.Dr. Gupta is 40% more efficient than Dr. Sharma,who is 20% more efficient than Dr. Singh. Dr. Guptatakes 10 days less than Dr. Sharma to completethe evaluation work. Dr. Gupta starts the evaluationwork and works for 10 days and then Dr. Sharmatakes over. Dr. Sharma evaluates for next 15 daysand then stops. In how many days, Dr. Singh cancomplete the remaining evaluation work.A. 7.2 days B. 9.5 daysC. 11.5 days D. None of thesewith approach
A?
EDIT
Calculation Mistake.
@rachit_28 said:
Assume the efficiencies of Gupta, Sharma and Singh be 1.4x, x and x/1.2 respectively.Now equating the work, xy = 1.4xy - 14xy = 35Therefore Singh will complete the work in 42 days.Now 10/25 + 15/35 + d/42 = 1On solving d= 7.2 days.
On solving you get, 2/5 + 3/7 + d/42 =1, i.e d/42 = 6/35 i.e d=36/5 = 7.2 Calculation Mistake.
@karl said:
D? I am getting 8.4.
chk above post no.2651 and 2652 for soln ....OA is 7.2...its a IIFT ques
@karl said:
On solving you get, 2/5 + 3/7 + d/42 =1, i.e d/42 = 6/35 i.e d=42/5 = 8.4
bhai, on solving, you'll get d= 36/5, mein galat to nhi bol raha naa ? :splat:
@pankaj1988 bahi dekh simple hai usne lika hai 10 days more toh
10=(40/100)*x
so x coms out to be 25
now 10 days more hue 35
now 35*20/100+7
now 35+7=42
now 10 days of dr gupta is equal toh 40% of work now 15 days of work of dr sharma is equal to 42.85
left is17.14 n dr singh tdoes 2.38% of wrk every day so 17.14 /2.38 gievs 7.20 approx
@rachit_28 said:
bhai, on solving, you'll get d= 36/5, mein galat to nhi bol raha naa ?
Sahi ho, Calculation mistake kar di maine. I hate none of these as option.
@pankaj1988 said:
chk above post no.2651 and 2652 for soln ....OA is 7.2...its a IIFT ques
Calculation mistake kar di thi last step main,
@karl especially in IIFT, maine kai saare questions ke answer none of these dekhe hai ! an alternate way to add the trick by increasing the frequency of OAs to none of these !
@pankaj1988 said:
Three Professors Dr. Gupta, Dr Sharma and Dr.Singh are evaluating answer scripts of a subject.Dr. Gupta is 40% more efficient than Dr. Sharma,who is 20% more efficient than Dr. Singh. Dr. Guptatakes 10 days less than Dr. Sharma to completethe evaluation work. Dr. Gupta starts the evaluationwork and works for 10 days and then Dr. Sharmatakes over. Dr. Sharma evaluates for next 15 daysand then stops. In how many days, Dr. Singh cancomplete the remaining evaluation work.A. 7.2 days B. 9.5 daysC. 11.5 days D. None of thesewith approach


g=g*1.4-10
=>g=25,sh=35

si=35*1.2=42

==>required days = [1-(10/25+15/35)]*42
==>[1-(2/5+3/7)]*42
==>[1-29/35]*42=6/5*6=7.2
@pankaj1988 said:
Three Professors Dr. Gupta, Dr Sharma and Dr.Singh are evaluating answer scripts of a subject.Dr. Gupta is 40% more efficient than Dr. Sharma,who is 20% more efficient than Dr. Singh. Dr. Guptatakes 10 days less than Dr. Sharma to completethe evaluation work. Dr. Gupta starts the evaluationwork and works for 10 days and then Dr. Sharmatakes over. Dr. Sharma evaluates for next 15 daysand then stops. In how many days, Dr. Singh cancomplete the remaining evaluation work.A. 7.2 days B. 9.5 daysC. 11.5 days D. None of thesewith approach


g=1.4sh=1.68si
sh=1.2si
1/sh-1/g=10 =>0.4/1.4sh=10
sh=4/140=1/35 , so sh takes 35 days , g takes 25 days,si takes 42 days
10/25 + 15/35 + K/42 =1
K=7.2days


Set A is a set of the first 400 primes that can be written in the form 3n + 1. Set B is a set of the first 600 primes that can be written in the form 6m + 1. How many elements does set (A ˆŠ B) have?
OPTIONS

1) 150
2) 200
3) 400
4) None of these
@sujamait 3?
@audiq7 said:
@sujamait 3?
yup!
A box B1 has 299 identical cards. These cards are divided into three heaps and placed in boxes B1, B2 and B3 such that each box has at least one card. What is the probability that B1 has more cards than B2 and B3 put together?
Real numbers - a, b and c - form an arithmetic progression. Some permutation of a, b and c also forms a geometric progression. If abc and c = 2396, what is the sum of all possible values of b?
OPTIONS

1) −599
2) 1198
3) 1797
4) 3594
5) Cannot be determined
@sujamait said:

A box B1 has 299 identical cards. These cards are divided into three heaps and placed in boxes B1, B2 and B3 such that each box has at least one card. What is the probability that B1 has more cards than B2 and B3 put together?
x = B1
y = B2
z = B3

x + y + z = 299 (Also, x,y,z >=1 )

z = 1 => y = 1 to 148
z = 2 => y = 1 to 147
and so on

z = 148 => y = 1

total possible values = 148*149 /2 = 11026

Probability = 11026 / 298C2 = 11026*2/298*297 = 0.25 approx ?
@sujamait said:
Real numbers - a, b and c - form an arithmetic progression. Some permutation of a, b and c also forms a geometric progression. If a ≠ b ≠ c and c = 2396, what is the sum of all possible values of b?OPTIONS1) −599 2) 1198 3) 1797 4) 3594 5) Cannot be determined
b = (a + c) /2...(1)

b is the not the geometric mean otherwise a = b = c ..

Case 1: c is the geometric mean => c^2 = a*b
Multiply (1) by a on both the sides => 2*ab = a^2 + ac
=> 2c^2 = a^2 + ac
=> c^2 - a^2 = ac - c^2
=> (c-a)*(c+a) = (a-c)*(c)
=> c + a = -c
=> a = -2c

=> b = -c/2

Case 2: a is the geometric mean => a^2 = b*c
Multiply (1) by c on both the sides => 2*bc = ac + c^2
=> 2a^2 = ac + c^2
=> a^2 - c^2 = ac - a^2
=> (a-c)*(a+c) = a*(c-a)
=> a + c = -a
=> a = -c/2

=> b = c/4

Sum of all possible values of b = -c/4 = -599 ?

@sujamait said:

Set A is a set of the first 400 primes that can be written in the form 3n + 1. Set B is a set of the first 600 primes that can be written in the form 6m + 1. How many elements does set (A ˆŠ B) have?OPTIONS1) 150 2) 200 3) 400 4) None of these
Set A has first 400 prime numbers of the form 3n + 1

Also, if 3n + 1 is a prime, then n must be of the form 2k = > A has first 400 prime numbers of the form 6k + 1

and B has first 600 prime numbers of the form 6m + 1
=> A ˆŠ B will contain 400 elements ?
@sujamait said:
yup!A box B1 has 299 identical cards. These cards are divided into three heaps and placed in boxes B1, B2 and B3 such that each box has at least one card. What is the probability that B1 has more cards than B2 and B3 put together?
b1+b2+b3=299

total=298c2

b1=150 => 148
b1=149 => 147
...
b1=297 => 1

p=[148/2*149]/298c2=11026/44253=0.25
@krum said:
b1+b2+b3=299total=298c2b1=150 => 148b1=149 => 147...b1=297 => 1p=[148/2*149]/298c2=11026/44253=0.25

YUp!!
74/297
@sujamait said:
Real numbers - a, b and c - form an arithmetic progression. Some permutation of a, b and c also forms a geometric progression. If a ≠ b ≠ c and c = 2396, what is the sum of all possible values of b?OPTIONS1) −599 2) 1198 3) 1797 4) 3594 5) Cannot be determined
2b=a+c

c^2=ab

=>c^2=(2b-c)*b
=>c^2-2b^2+cb=0

c=[-b(+/-)root(b^2+8b^2)]/2
c=-2b or b

ignoring c=b => b=-c/2

a^2=cb

=>(2b-c)^2-cb=0
=>4b^2+c^2-5bc=0

c=[5b(+/-)root(25b^2-16b^2)]/2
c=4b or b

ignoring c=b => b=c/4

sum=-c/4= -599