Sarees made from cloth type A.Cloth type B made from cotton.Cotton is made from yarn.I. Correct.If A and B intersection is not a null set then can be true.II. IncorrectIf A and B intersection is a null set then can be false.III. Incorrect"Some" cloth is made from some yarn.
bhai venn diag batana aise nahi pata chal ra hai...
Sarees made from cloth type A.Cloth type B made from cotton.Cotton is made from yarn.I. Correct.If A and B intersection is not a null set then can be true.II. IncorrectIf A and B intersection is a null set then can be false.III. Incorrect"Some" cloth is made from some yarn.
Agree about 3 being incorrect..should be some cloth is made from some yarn..but then yarn and saree is not connected..so 1 can be true only for a specific condition? And since it is an affirmative statement..there is no need to draw an alternate diagram
Some sarees are made from cloth. Some cloth is made from cotton. Cotton is made from yarn.I. Yarn may be used to make some sarees.II. Cotton is used to make some sarees. III. Cloth is made from some yarn.ps:approach bata dena yar..
If the question says find the conclusion which can be derived using all the three statements
=> I is the conclusion
If the question says find the conclusion which can be derived using any two of the three statements
Agree about 3 being incorrect..should be some cloth is made from some yarn..but then yarn and saree is not connected..so 1 can be true only for a specific condition? And since it is an affirmative statement..there is no need to draw an alternate diagram
1 can be true only for a specific condition. The statement has a "maybe".
Some sarees are made from cloth. Some cloth is made from cotton. Cotton is made from yarn.I. Yarn may be used to make some sarees.II. Cotton is used to make some sarees. III. Cloth is made from some yarn.ps:approach bata dena yar..
1 can be true only for a specific condition. The statement has a "maybe".bhai aapke venn diagram me yarn aur saree ke sets intersect ho sakte hainThere is a "maybe" given.
Agreed..so should we consider that case? Normally for affirmative statements we do not draw an alternate diagram..I am using a TIME method..so maybe wrong..but if it is a negative statement, that is when we draw an AD, right?
1 can be true only for a specific condition. The statement has a "maybe".bhaiaapkevenn diagram me yarnaur saree ke sets intersect ho saktehainThere is a "maybe" given.
A coin of diameter d is thrown randmly on a floor tiled with squares of side l. Two players bet that the coin will land on exactly one, respectively, more than one, square. What relation should l and d satisfy for the game to be fair?
A coin of diameter d is thrown randmly on a floor tiled with squares of side l. Two players bet that the coin will land on exactly one, respectively, more than one, square. What relation should l and d satisfy for the game to be fair? @jain4444 - welcome!!!!
First player will win with 100% chance when square exactly circumscribes the coin..
that is if side of square is d
but side of tile is l
50 -50 k liye l-d ka square ka area half ho puri tile(side l ) ke