CMAT : AIR 298 (September 2012, Score 264 )
10th - 92.8 (CBSE)
12th -91.2(CBSE)
Grads - 77(Anna Univ)
Work-Ex - 18 months
Batch of Interview - 27th Morning at Brainstorm consultancy , Bangalore
GD Topic - The Delhi rape victim " the braveheart was it wrong on her part to have stayed out so late in the night " or something like that .
Experience -
GD was very organized. We were a group of 9 ppl and everyone of us were given 15 second opening statement/ introduction. After that 5 minutes of discussion. Since the topic is fairly favoring one view, all of us were unequivocal about the opinions which we expressed. This was followed by conclusion statement by each one of us. Everyone were given 15 seconds to make the conclusion.
Positives of the GD: Everyone got a chance to speak.
the discussion was very calm and not heated.
Negatives: It was an unequivocal topic and hence there was no room for much arguments or expression of original opinions after analyzing the topic.
PI - I was the last guy in my panel to get interviewed. After what seemed like an eternity ( around 3 hours since the completion of GD ) i was called inside. The 2 prof asked me to take my seat. I was asked to hand over my file to one of them. Now P2( a charming 30 plus or minus year old gentleman ) told me " we are tired interviewing ppl, why don't you ask us questions and we will answer. I was speechless 
. Then P1 ( a 35 something year old gentleman ) asked me my XAT score and i said i applied via CMAT. He asked me why and i said i screwed up my XAT. He then asked me " Marks are not a measure of intelligence are they ? " . I replied politely that its not the only criteria. Then P1 said " your CMAT score is 264 , we don't know how to judge that score alongside XAT scores ( He was starting to turn on the heat , which became evident to me ). I replied politely that my rank is 298 AIR and its a good score. He then tried to provoke me saying " CMAT is an exam where ppl with low competence appear and you have simply been good among the worst ppl ". I felt a little irritated but i didn't show it . Then P2 said " According to you marks don't reflect intelligence , do they ". I again replied, " No i meant its not only criteria". P1 now got agitated and asked " Do you know John Nash "?
Me:I dont know.
P1: He was linked with game theory ( Check Wiki guys π )
Me: I said ok.
P1 : He scored really high in exams and yet had great IQ.
Me : Ok sir.
P2: So you don't believe marks reflect intelligence , so are the universities and colleges jokers to conduct exams ?
Me : I didnt mean that sir.
P1: Prove your intelligence.
ME: What ? how do you want me to prove it ? Ask me something ?
P2: We will give you one chance to prove your intelligence. Prove yourself.
ME: Its really abstract. Shall i present a case study?
P2: Where is the case yaar ( Looking around for a briefcase )
ME ( partly amused and yet irritated) : OK , i shall prove with an example and started to rant about some stock market BS .
P2( getting irritated ) : We know this already. We want you to prove your intelligence.
Me: Ok sir i shall tell you an example from my coll days ( strted narrating )
P2: ( After a minute or so , he stopped pretending to listen ) Hey you are narrating some story when i ask you to prove your intelligence.
P1:Ok tell me why we shud select you ?
Me : 
( puzzled and fumbled)
P1: let me rephrase it, tell me 2 reasons which can get you rejected .
Me : ( gave them the first counter punch). Maybe since i applied via CMAT and you don't deem it as competent enough .
P2 and P1 ( a little shaken ) : Ok tell me some personality traits of yours which can get you rejected ?
Me : I m confident about myself. If i don't fit in your system , it doesnt mean its something abt my personality .
P2: ( appeared again a little shaken ) : No you have misunderstood the qn , we asked you which traits of yours can get you rejected.
Me: I honestly can't think of any such thing and i am confident of myself.
P2: Ok so why are you wearing an ear stud?
Me: Its supposedly good for the nerves ( read somewhere on the net )
P2 now started joking : It has seriously affected your brains.
then he started saying something to P1 in hindi .
Me : Sir , if you don't mind pls talk in English , i m not conversant in Hindi.
P1 and P2 ( both shaken now ) : Then the conversation somehow got drifted to my reactions.
P2 : Yes i will speak in english.
Somehow the conversation got drifted to my reactions and they asked me if i have temper issues . I said no.
P2:Tell me your strengths and Weakness. I want you to do a SWOT Analysis.
Me : told my strengths n weakness and how i overcome them.
P2: So what is the opportunities for you in future?
Me : going forward , i shud look at this interview experience as a learning curve and not take it personally.
P2( Impressed by the answer ): Excellent. any qns you have ? or anything you want to say ?
Me: Nothing
P2 : you can leave now.
Me : Thank you ( with a smile ) and left.
Defintely i was grilled. It was more like a stress interview and lasted around 15-20 min. So pretty much they were provoking me , but in the end it ended well. Maybe i was a little aggressive too. Any comments PUYS ?? ( your feedback is welcome π π )
Any other interesting thing -