This DM from XAT 2015 still confuses me!!
Mr. Dipangshu Barua, a young IT professional, came early to office to assist his boss in the preparation
for an important client presentation. When he switched on his computer, he saw an email from Mr.
Patel. The email was asfollows:
Dear Mr. Barua, January 2, 2015
This email serves as a follow-up of my conversation with you on December 1, 2014. I have already conveyed need for improvement in your behaviour as desired by your project leader and colleagues. They are yet to notice any visible improvements. I am apprehensive that your failure to act may warrant
further action leading to dismissal. I will continue to monitor and assess your performance over the next three months to determine whether improvements meet the expectations. At the same time, I would like to re-affirm that you are very valuable for our organization.
Best Wishes,
Mr. A. Patel
HR Director
The scheduled presentation went off smoothly. Back in his cabin, Dipangshu read Mr Patel's e-mail once more and pondered over it. During the last meeting he tried hard to put forward his explanation but Mr. Patel had not allowed him to speak. Dipangshu was thinking of meeting Mr. Patel once again but was doubtful whether that would help. Incidentally, he had a job offer from a start-up with a comparable salary. If Dipangshu was to join the new job, he had to accept the offer within the next two weeks. However, he cannot think of a life without a job.
Dipangshu was confused!
Which of the following options would be the best move for Dipangshu?
A. Talk to Mr. Patel and highlight the initiatives he has taken but at the same time start applying for other jobs.
B. Reject the offer from the start-up. Use the next three monthsto find a better job, but continue in the present job.
C. Resign from this organization right now.
D. Accept the offer, only if the start-up gives a salary hike, else keep prospecting.
E. Accept the offer with a request to give him a 10% salary hike.
TIME says opt A, IMS says opt D, I marked opt E.
Can anyone help me ith the reasoning that went here?